From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P9jfC-0006zL-8v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:22:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58164E07E6; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:21:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06122E07E1 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from afta-gentoo.localnet (ip-85-198-235-97.broker.com.pl [85.198.235.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1654A1B41E1; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:21:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis To: Gentoo Development Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Patch for python.eclass Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:21:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-tuxonice-r8-AFTA; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: qa@gentoo.org References: <201010180333.56025.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <1287414945.2784.0.camel@saladin.local> <201010220356.57904.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201010220356.57904.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart160985834.KeupqjiQYl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010232122.33589.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: ff2f45df-468d-4864-aefe-5f3424ce250c X-Archives-Hash: 697e78e64497267009a8662dbf37ac0d --nextPart160985834.KeupqjiQYl Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010-10-22 09:56:56 Mike Frysinger napisa=C5=82(a): > On Monday, October 18, 2010 11:15:45 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > > Il giorno lun, 18/10/2010 alle 17.10 +0200, Arfrever ha scritto: > > > No. It's not related to that bug. > >=20 > > So I guess Mike's next reply is going to be "and what are you waiting > > for, before fixing it?". Seriously. >=20 > i guess the answer is that you need someone on the QA team to fix it for = you ? You shouldn't assume, that I can write answers when I'm away. I will work on a patch. =2D-=20 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis --nextPart160985834.KeupqjiQYl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMwzX5AAoJEFU3/w1zlLfgzjsP/0h1s82LYAqtlPTEkypeay/0 eKvr28VGDY2VfVU4o934NkokdmblVKJSHp9wjBFJEhyoKaMOURAM5DBUOR6SD2Ue YwbacoTjqe9mrOIrNXC6EqlW+ICAhPBgnT3KOdCJjyuja5zvJAa3jfdSrgHEpKat B6tSEMyErcuFqJeJOst+yomwDa3bI1q+HK2PfN/m0Is/LTikz91oJGoI3mG9CBzk OaQiVfSC5FYyyavu+r/+teGI1wjYa3dNTQZ1qIfc6qRqhTZ90MTGFWoW01nWFmrU oQWUrSLGenRX25TKt9xR5tGJAJ+tqtfgQwY7vC258bHBthss379sHcBpaa7qe8B1 5mPq++d4Vr9hxUppb9hRjniFaBpvyrfZmUVHR+nbMYlTnXiKiU+j+WKyeqkH7apk qPp0Hrdbd3l6Y2lfh1nrMtrEAVugmLaqUqB9A0LsKk4K3EAyol5v1GSKZcuf4uBj 6YeAN/YUpD/1RUb6ABScET51eJHtlMpGYOE9q9deS7s0PSAPGCtaG2oRRaFeEuM4 0piDJM886R1HC7xxITfZyhnRXfUnMRVUjaUlAKJxJCW6CICVu/5QbtuSDdYHJSAK aTPMjS+K+bfmalsYMYEpEkv77Qt+vybI8/aWpLHQV7mN8UCEY6eytrrekStKyT7L U9g1dSNemAm9IeIP1SAf =n297 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart160985834.KeupqjiQYl--