From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OwTAT-0008CU-GB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:07:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CF1BE09F2 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F35EE0979 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7AF1B4005 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:54:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: fox.eclass update Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:56:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.35.4; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <4C921C29.6010502@gentoo.org> <201009161834.18258.vapier@gentoo.org> <20100916215121.4d0f77df@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20100916215121.4d0f77df@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9520749.VMa36QpOnZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009170056.47597.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: db7beece-9709-4f6a-9ddb-c4de11dbb584 X-Archives-Hash: d36d41fbba7a4b35b6050128657bc5c4 --nextPart9520749.VMa36QpOnZ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, September 16, 2010 23:51:21 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:34:17 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Thursday, September 16, 2010 15:41:27 Peter Volkov wrote: > > > =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 16/09/2010 =D0=B2 15:29 -0400, Mike Frysin= ger =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > > > > FOX_PV=3D"${FOX_PV:-${PV}}" > > > >=20 > > > > while you're here, i'd change to: > > > > : ${FOX_PV:=3D${PV}} > > >=20 > > > Why? This looks less readable... > >=20 > > only because your eyes arent tuned to it >=20 > What exactly is the advantage though? Is it something to do with command > vs assignment? i guess if you like typing the same variable name twice, then the old style= is=20 for you. i do not like. =2Dmike --nextPart9520749.VMa36QpOnZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMkvUPAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBiRcP/2rfYxh0AE7JNJMIVgSyOP/e ntnEUMGjJ9QdizEvyW1RSLuUwBe/lmqHewCrbJ3B3tyVxCTTTzhNccw83z8eAtiH G0gGV2lipK5I1o8OnspvEzKUFNLHyxiy1BehX2OtpU8ErIR05MsZ2lWXUxGuROBP bM4m8BZcrWeBWO4RPuULXooJz9XgGIllwokcklVbTORDqNZMMxu8uXTofJe5uzMn IMOc2XwqMMSAZnwRF1FzqLZqNHDGZGk7NQWoa1ogxGknX0KXJKKgctXq+ao60MBE 0wvH6Lvh0lH9OMNnxDz9CSiX/6Qkksc+w42XxhOv4XrQfHI//ofmxfwJmTHF+2fs ua33WsEhmjcVorGZVdjMWi6X5odjgdauXSuIjg2JMrxgnmMBKgXnn/BqhHcK8k+T m9+DZaunJDt8w/bBYRe8lmO+Iqqtoc9kaYMUopzFkVzjwn7/Dr5Q1PmyKnRzSjyJ l0UtUnMoRQjAWfD2FcbDhQuSLlTcTpevEb4ne3p9ksu5hQXVkp0cYnXKWQSkJskp v89OSDoOdZaBoaW0BbELWFq0M1MOip9Bo/NUh94FQFnv1MZHzgSvOCK3QtdOuteH zTvZZECGAbJ1Ba81i2IuN5VZmapiRTMwwNCLuL1+gC09HL4jkU5BZbF1QGk2Neg8 SkgoMI6sWni00Wufs6bw =sJYy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9520749.VMa36QpOnZ--