From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OwNb0-00072S-2d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:10:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93602E09CF for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1629E07C9 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 22:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2190F1B401C; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 22:31:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: fox.eclass update Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:33:58 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.35.4; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Matti Bickel References: <4C921C29.6010502@gentoo.org> <201009161530.12532.vapier@gentoo.org> <4C927CEE.4090901@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4C927CEE.4090901@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1645168.v0D98KA0ry"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009161833.59579.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 2b189239-d04e-4ae6-b802-470b7b5301de X-Archives-Hash: 8f282f90b89adc779881ea0b3ea5f9c6 --nextPart1645168.v0D98KA0ry Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, September 16, 2010 16:24:14 Matti Bickel wrote: > On 09/16/2010 09:29 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> + if [[ -f ${D}/usr/bin/fox-config ]] ; then > >> + mv "${D}/usr/bin/fox-config" "${D}/usr/bin/fox-${FOXVER}-config" > >>=20 > >> fi > >=20 > > seems like you would want || die here >=20 > Why? I can't imagine how that could fail. then the `die` should never be called =2Dmike --nextPart1645168.v0D98KA0ry Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMkptXAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBdu4QANhBJzE1SEWuxI3mHuCMYojw TwdChtRaPy2DqhcEMU8aGEw4F7W6ZDXQr1gqTDZdTWk4QXAisXR0FYEtG32XCXXL S4w/TKXoErbkCJGeDSBLHqhzfcmEYzVpfLsI/9p7Luma9z1uo2+30OrSH9KSmdXg fvp1GwccqUg2dS2g8luP880TaujPp4wh/JMg892/y7MgHVpfc3xQq3k8hs5/sHt9 NiEmnzCC2rZtqiLgjni6Nc76B3+bX9U4cNduWiW+V+bOSqOc+qeH+OQ9vx+jJL3t m05UkWZgErJOHwicgjtlGneaSAVtLwKzdLBNBEqEx0Kc5QTcha4FmKBGvDNQ14w9 M1Sq80ogd2+bU67yH7nDja4Lv3Gv2VOICiwWnbSMYhqoOs9sDh7Qag0oyv3FCof8 eNObstTP8zrfAgEt2zB3qTMZIPlnfMJRuWqM59qkJYx8zug+AfQAWCKhbFaThb/U h4IA6Sf9Fj8okp1j66gT4V4bsyBixNCdEVGeK46NIDFqxkihW9cyBSNCfocW7IiN kh+PAAAt2H9015VT7Nh1ZbT3tPcW32UGPGwfMihCgvyN44aCqv/pBu4o8ZmxeKkq ANoZNjRcz5Ma8on1xJ+utKpD6BVOWk8vTxLaXYaudgDpKCHc3sllmLtghO5cPmzp cNwOzeQMkN8SI4Gcyx9A =X4zy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1645168.v0D98KA0ry--