From: Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:14:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100824211432.39c0612e@angelstorm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C7494BA.4040104@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 642 bytes --]
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:57:46 -0500
Nathan Zachary <nathanzachary@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I don't think that the documentation changes should be a determining
> factor in switching to OpenRC. If we are going to endorse using OpenRC,
> the more relevant issues are the ones regarding its future development.
> The documentation can be updated in due time. Of course, that's just my
> opinion.
It's not really a determining factor in whether or not we adopt it as our default system. It's just one of the big tasks to complete if we do. I'm not arguing against using OpenRC just because the docs will require significant rewrites.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-25 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-04 14:29 [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo Lars Wendler
2010-07-04 15:01 ` [gentoo-dev] " Nikos Chantziaras
2010-07-04 18:23 ` Daniel Schömer
2010-07-04 15:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " Fabio Erculiani
2010-07-04 18:35 ` Markos Chandras
2010-07-04 19:39 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2010-07-04 20:09 ` Jory A. Pratt
2010-07-05 2:23 ` Richard Freeman
2010-07-05 3:32 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-07-05 8:57 ` Duncan
2010-08-23 15:05 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2010-08-23 15:16 ` Jory A. Pratt
2010-08-23 16:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-23 17:26 ` Olivier Crête
2010-08-23 18:09 ` Mike Auty
2010-08-23 18:28 ` Olivier Crête
2010-08-23 18:43 ` Patrick McLean
2010-08-24 9:19 ` Patrick Lauer
2010-08-24 12:57 ` Thilo Bangert
2010-08-24 14:30 ` Richard Freeman
2010-08-24 16:38 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-08-24 17:18 ` Christian Faulhammer
2010-08-25 3:21 ` Joshua Saddler
2010-08-25 3:57 ` Nathan Zachary
2010-08-25 4:14 ` Joshua Saddler [this message]
2010-08-25 16:37 ` Richard Freeman
2010-08-25 19:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-25 20:16 ` Richard Freeman
2010-08-26 0:29 ` Duncan
2010-08-26 17:02 ` Richard Freeman
2010-08-26 18:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-27 1:55 ` Duncan
2010-08-24 16:19 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-24 19:07 ` Thilo Bangert
2010-07-05 13:03 ` Anthony G. Basile
2010-07-04 16:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Pacho Ramos
2010-07-04 21:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-07-04 22:04 ` Lars Wendler
2010-07-04 22:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-07-04 23:23 ` Lars Wendler
2010-07-05 1:03 ` Olivier Crête
2010-07-05 1:30 ` Brian Harring
2010-07-05 16:11 ` Enrico Weigelt
2010-07-05 3:23 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-07-05 4:13 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-07-05 16:13 ` Enrico Weigelt
2010-07-07 0:56 ` Doug Goldstein
2010-07-05 7:29 ` Patrick Lauer
2010-08-23 14:17 ` Jon Portnoy
2010-08-23 20:21 ` Luca Barbato
2010-08-23 20:30 ` Anthony G. Basile
2010-08-23 21:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-24 9:08 ` Luca Barbato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100824211432.39c0612e@angelstorm \
--to=nightmorph@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox