From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OnwAp-0005Mv-QL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:16:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E74BE07F2; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB5FE07AE for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91B31B4062; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:16:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:19:12 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Thilo Bangert References: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <4C738E95.1010501@gentoo.org> <201008241457.49173.bangert@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201008241457.49173.bangert@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1986162.20J5VUnLeQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008241219.12983.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 8736762b-d343-446e-86ba-2f3b4fd6856a X-Archives-Hash: 26dcb4da70f154a8a3ec56a99c9df293 --nextPart1986162.20J5VUnLeQ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, August 24, 2010 08:57:45 Thilo Bangert wrote: > > , efficient, known-good solution > > that does what you'd expect it to do and replace it with a new thingy > > that doesn't provide all the features, is harder to debug etc. etc.? I > > just don't see any *advantage* from it apart from saying "OMG HAZ NEW > > FEATRUES" :) >=20 > one feature of systemd is, that it has an active upstream. =2E.. and so does openrc > no, i dont think it would be a good idea to switch to systemd, just yet. > but like the original baselayout was breaking new ground back when it > first was developed, so is systemd. it does things differently and may not > have all features yet, but from the outset it appears to be vastly > superior to sysv-style inits, upstart and openrc. nothing is stopping you or anyone else from making systemd work under Gentoo =2Dmike --nextPart1986162.20J5VUnLeQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMc/EAAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBe3oP/2ZKdsVZKrIEDPMSaGedS52G 9YrBV3mC0c1Xu4SAzC4gSjWYT3ENFervJk80OYLjcOn3j+UcWivlsBqHsXP0X2wg mdeYJBY++JhIXTAv8R8rh4ZUIhXqbnBhsnCfTwbd17NPZal8+UIT8XogbTDMDhoF o+H13pap9P0kWiawwwz57nhYv5h+ZhiitXzTB85Ws1AtAlzWKiIbiupMzGo3aFBC Bb5+VdrublgRLaNqHfBlQRe3IunZr/IG1aAESg+idvxLHDblvFY5HdH2yctvejQu PbiKDsfPVxFrRKw4iFN+p3Vn2aVBh35cryuyW+ThDEAEDQ2LOOjpVLWCb9ksEVDd XbBVKJGJaJA6/fD5V5Jbw4RMtd2fhlUYSbWDZz0Y/uLalcNDLd3w7UxmCQjDUBK1 kvIHJd+5HbMzn0dr7apnlZIW0gXfG3tM8vCU7KdtcMlqhps83qdOBodDP5A+WrY3 xSEJa9vskinpgwDMXDmHRY3VyM6A7TcYUi3guWOoSbzLpEdgTBLwIn9ZYD2TmQLd +L+cxEcUrbaB7n7+V1eL241qio8ixis72FEtr963HO8n0jb+/BI5m971oY0IXsqP hQPXFluy1x9UW8yfHsLz3rxbOvaFN9d2mL41gN5Iuy3vRdFR/ONsnkHqoHLOpVtJ N41M67mlBWWUmTY3aIRQ =ggx5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1986162.20J5VUnLeQ--