From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OnwWo-0007pt-HR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:39:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 725B2E0837; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E379E030B for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from angelstorm (cpe-76-93-166-255.san.res.rr.com [76.93.166.255]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 787231B40C1 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:38:49 -0700 From: Joshua Saddler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo Message-ID: <20100824093849.35a0ed07@angelstorm> In-Reply-To: <4C73D77C.8090105@gentoo.org> References: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <1282584393.4313.6.camel@TesterTop4> <4C738E95.1010501@gentoo.org> <201008241457.49173.bangert@gentoo.org> <4C73D77C.8090105@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/IfJoeNky3A0pHbrzjrARYIz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: cf0534f4-a33a-4379-9960-f298a5c77615 X-Archives-Hash: e4de7fc88365b227e131b622b51b83f1 --Sig_/IfJoeNky3A0pHbrzjrARYIz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:30:20 -0400 Richard Freeman wrote: > Looking at the tracker bug, I see all of three issues blocking openrc=20 > from going stable. One is documentation, > It seems like we should just make the next bugday "OpenRC Cleanup Day"=20 > or something like that. Everybody can take 15 minutes to contribute to=20 > a wiki on getting started with openrc, or blog about it, or whatever.=20 > the docs team can glean the best of that and get the docs in order. Oh heck no. We're not about to wade through a hundred blog entries/wiki art= icles in a desparate attempt to assemble a coherent guide. Besides, Doug, Roy, and I wrote a migration guide a few years ago that I've= been constantly updating: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked stabl= e, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our other doc files. --Sig_/IfJoeNky3A0pHbrzjrARYIz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxz9Z8ACgkQxPWMzpKk6kNHwgCfXUqDYqfGFkEjToVi7Blx4cxv +kcAnRrfbaqirIa7jFqlPfgncM81eMcQ =8/7K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/IfJoeNky3A0pHbrzjrARYIz--