From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Omatg-0006Tk-Q6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:21:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00467E0803; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE9AE08B0 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so1220802wwi.4 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=oyH1hJ6rcWjeYl141kM20dfv0G/Nzq12JzzBPtbK01o=; b=HTIor+2/igwoSLlVJIDZqmZtc/927eWscRYbl7AMcKSY7d6ANBMVDOO2VG7aTA7VN0 aDpMTNczuyZGWGZXq5qQcqprNC4o99BzVmI8QC6XHb3qH9Hj/TrUkUxJzgpQ27mY0rBW jKkBxwPhdiESVGWcNQRQ7ibqKsgf7lSvn6clM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=hZtULdYjDmAzzc3zeo66Y1ZK+Eg9GZP4YFBUDfKNhwFihkZmt1X71sUvudItHGj+BU eSK4smNNxncEW5R1aftVKLSBU75GPe53hT4iTskyk3ZC3Uy5fPySlK7YYafr4sYNQqlk 2tNDw2CmQuzmNnDFCUg+aDaGtSj4a5rA452Bk= Received: by 10.227.134.194 with SMTP id k2mr1949802wbt.86.1282346449090; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mystical (188.4.102.108.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [188.4.102.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b23sm2606092wbb.16.2010.08.20.16.20.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Markos Chandras Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 02:23:49 +0300 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Treecleaner Project: Maintainer-needed page Message-ID: <20100820232348.GA23385@Mystical> References: <20100820113320.GA13020@Mystical> <20100820194105.GA23734@Mystical> <201008202256.57657.bangert@gentoo.org> <20100820210739.GA24919@Mystical> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 9ae235ec-88d3-4bf2-b619-b8d380b2f095 X-Archives-Hash: c8ddc67060c40e5feb84f7e192ec49bb --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:13:36PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:07:39AM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:56:55PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > The script is running daily at 4:15 AM (UTC) I think but it only > > > > updates the page when needed. > > > > Using pquery it finds all the maintainer-needed packages. Then it > > > > compares this list to the yesterdays' one and decides if an update = to > > > > the page is necessary or not > > >=20 > > > perhaps you can add a timestamp at the bottom to indicate when the li= st=20 > > > was last updated. dont know if the date on the right is updated but a= =20 > > > timestamp would be more accurate. > > The date is accurate. I don't thing if there is a real need to know the= exact > > time that this page was generated. > Can we break up the list for package with active bugs and packages > without? >=20 > I see a bunch of stuff in there that I use, but they've been extremely > bugfree, so I've never bothered with any maintenance. >=20 > Some bits: > app-office/ledger > net-misc/fakeidentd > net-misc/wakeonlan > net-nds/ldapvi > sys-apps/blktool > sys-apps/fxload > sys-process/incron >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Robin Hugh Johnson > Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead > E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org > GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 >=20 That would be nice yes, but I can't think of a way to implement it atm. I w= ill try to come up with something --=20 Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxvDoQACgkQ9/cejkQaxBBHqgCfVgXdEdOnuSlGGyHYxeYZSzM1 V3cAn18peCVYSWN6yegoWn+yizPSaj0F =3bWK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--