From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ol4ed-0002sN-TQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:43:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADDACE0775; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F85E0886 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from angelstorm (cpe-76-93-166-255.san.res.rr.com [76.93.166.255]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA1BC1B40DE for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0700 From: Joshua Saddler To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page Message-ID: <20100816114306.1b11f2b6@angelstorm> In-Reply-To: <20100816133408.GA25604@Mystical> References: <4C5F584A.1050804@gentoo.org> <4C68C578.6020402@gentoo.org> <20100816133408.GA25604@Mystical> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/dU3nu8E6futfh1/=DFmrCXF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 32b96224-82e4-45f2-9226-da710a45ded7 X-Archives-Hash: ef5a742b48b19475292b6d85ef0f9791 --Sig_/dU3nu8E6futfh1/=DFmrCXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part o= f the > webpage like dosc or pr teams Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is directly respo= nsible for those pages, though all three teams have provided input in the p= ast. There's just me. I happen to be on all three teams, but none of those teams themselves are r= esponsible for /main/ content. That said, I've been looking at the proposed changes, so I'll be implementi= ng some or all of them soon, probably today, time permitting. --Sig_/dU3nu8E6futfh1/=DFmrCXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxphr0ACgkQxPWMzpKk6kOwywCgumvvHUoDW7sqGWL1Qkvc1Mu4 khEAoLCE0rYzGOo5lJ6Clqh6i5JDx7WB =HXUi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dU3nu8E6futfh1/=DFmrCXF--