From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OkJay-0004go-K7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:28:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28C83E09E0; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE838E09BF for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marsupilami.localnet (84-238-115-127.u.parknet.dk [84.238.115.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C4F21B41C7 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:28:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Thilo Bangert Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/mlt: ChangeLog mlt-0.5.4-r1.ebuild Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 18:26:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35.1; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) References: <20100806212139.9E8422CE15@corvid.gentoo.org> <20100814131013.GA1363@linuxized.com> <20100814134739.GA4529@Mystical> In-Reply-To: <20100814134739.GA4529@Mystical> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1550639.W5pNZ8UXY5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008141826.48995.bangert@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 6f684147-7c8f-4c1e-9993-f405e0169da1 X-Archives-Hash: 3e502ed4e64057890704d2c2eb14fb0c --nextPart1550639.W5pNZ8UXY5 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > So you want me to force everyone to update the package just to respect > the LDFLAGS. yes. IIRC it has been stated on this list before, that a change which=20 changes the resulting binary always needs to be done in a revbump.=20 > Why, since until recently, nobody gave a crap about this > kind of QA issues? Thats a bad excuse! >=20 > Please provide a patch for devmanual to make it more clear. Good idea. Any takers? thanks kind regards Thilo --nextPart1550639.W5pNZ8UXY5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkxmw8gACgkQxRElEoA5AndvJwCgy1YszcbLl9q721WpJXHzw6ki fd8AoNpIYClKFPqyY7DObkCO0AQlLArj =z+iQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1550639.W5pNZ8UXY5--