From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OkHiR-000155-Hn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:28:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90C0DE0885; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90CFE07EC for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so4666270wyf.40 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:27:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=la0XYilKz9gn7iDEs/ZOK4nVlIRzZ8DRYUYO6YGGiQA=; b=Gg8PJKqSMPwG3PITnG82ke2d7iJ5tpDdL63fpi8kzJWzJNvekBKOEUtvAE0URJPkQ/ 4hw8Um8jYJlHJK6n2X8TXlOgKZuICYQKLDfPbuefDG06h7pgYMld8ZcCU6+haaUT1tXJ E3ILEPoNPsp1YzcTmns6VxOY52f6GX19omUAA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=EIQOD0qceJYOXgYmHBCO3Ic4aESKbCBfTEYIw/GagZe9Fnw7a3LLOU39BCWLQrV3Ya H6P2cNlRkIUAb6w8oHrKYgDC6FmfN87w0tKKLV6uutkrSOQyhHBzmd78Ni3vq6/ZxIrf KRPEUgCUGzeJh5CfEG/Au5wOxnJlh2ZuP7YBI= Received: by 10.216.44.208 with SMTP id n58mr667696web.73.1281796075210; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mystical (178.128.37.41.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [178.128.37.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o84sm2194878wej.13.2010.08.14.07.27.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:27:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Markos Chandras Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:29:44 +0300 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/mlt: ChangeLog mlt-0.5.4-r1.ebuild Message-ID: <20100814142944.GA15913@Mystical> References: <20100806212139.9E8422CE15@corvid.gentoo.org> <201008141637.04507.aballier@gentoo.org> <20100814140038.GB4529@Mystical> <201008141720.39003.aballier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008141720.39003.aballier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 58146bda-f69c-48b5-ad03-bc05fee5618f X-Archives-Hash: d0f9d5b9fbaf383f7d0fbd95472ed6cd --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 05:20:38PM +0300, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Saturday 14 August 2010 17:00:38 Markos Chandras wrote: > [...] > > > > > - There is absolutely no reference to any patch sent upstream and= I > > > > > have not seen anything on the upstream dev ml. > > > >=20 > > > > Thats because I didn't. I've fixed more than 40 bug wrt LDFLAGS. Do= you > > > > expect me to subscribe to 40 different ML and send them upstream? > > >=20 > > > you don't need to subscribe, there's usually an AUTHORS file with ema= ils > > > you can use... > >=20 > > As I said, I thought that maintainers was responsible to do it since th= ey > > follow all the bug progress after all. So according to you I should do = all > > the work. Tempting >=20 > yes please; I consider not doing it a bit rude as the maintainers will _h= ave_=20 > to clean after you. So do I. Fixing your package and you don't even bother to send a *ready to = go* patch upstream seems like a bit rude to me as well. Perhaps, we do have a complete different point of view in this one. Recent example is Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n who thanked me = for fixing his package, asked me to attach the patch so *he* can send it upstream. I thoug= ht that was the *default* policy. Anyway. I should talk to each maintainer separately when I fix his package. Seems to me is the best approach >[...]=20 > A. >=20 --=20 Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxmqFgACgkQ9/cejkQaxBCeFwCfa6uJsbpqwWMgozFGKv3rlWr4 Tg8AniE1OAEY3e8rxPt5zLCxEWuz5nHN =7hqu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--