From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-42201-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Oj7Kj-0004Co-IL
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:10:49 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 435CCE0BB9;
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:10:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5219E0B03
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:10:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so8227153wyf.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc
:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type
:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
bh=Eb6YX1GCWkBlcP3QJqb9DFeoqc02Z5jI/sfY1IQpnTo=;
b=ASJlURBQuNbgMlJME2gD8F/T+jAPUFOTV5/rdkleYLyxeyBEZfpFX0f6tGQ4co0m17
lgBhMMPMEYozYX5+llSDHEjbIZ39hbdo5zjNZOJ22j9flioTnrrVELhRBWRyMXlGh4JJ
UDRWyZuy9WI1JuD6gYnDXGJiBqr1/Z/h89r4s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
b=SBls07yL5kjtvwkuQJcXQZyLP+59zGEI2zd5XYThpk1V1OnzL6JiCeJymF2of6fgYK
dUgVq7r2wFfS0ljbV/HsXEjpyKrmJfhXkUeLW1ykBK93fb1CDzgxWwGgKPBeGjGbcgmQ
50sHTxUiBUPNrx6+HgZwwapMDx7+7eIG9VHNE=
Received: by 10.216.158.80 with SMTP id p58mr16363917wek.44.1281517827117;
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mystical (178.128.37.41.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [178.128.37.41])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j1sm3922087wej.15.2010.08.11.02.10.23
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:11:38 +0300
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, qa@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS
Message-ID: <20100811091138.GA19768@Mystical>
References: <20100807163230.GA31575@Mystical>
<1281201535.29176.45.camel@yamato.local>
<20100810215352.GA7980@Mystical>
<AANLkTi=RoCPQ=8LXLN-hAKQ5owNbMVReY=Pn5ydoyyL2@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=RoCPQ=8LXLN-hAKQ5owNbMVReY=Pn5ydoyyL2@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Archives-Salt: 9034354f-c081-4d49-b066-37abc799efcf
X-Archives-Hash: 8fe1bee11f879c31274716f4b77a1953
--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:31:52PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track
> >> down
> >> packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=3Dgnu is a
> >> good way
> >> to do that. I would like to see this linker flag enabled by default on
> >> LDFLAGS
> >> (or at least for the dev/ profiles for now). Do you agree?
> >
> > I would really really *really* appreciated if our beloved arch testers =
( at least for linux amd64/x86
> > because they are the first who stabilize a package ) make this default
> > on their build boxes.
>=20
> sounds like someone needs to update/extend the arch testing
> documentation. random e-mails posted to random dev lists are quickly
> forgotten. new arch testers however should be reading the arch tester
> documnt.
>
I will update the guide for amd64 HT and I will strongly advice the rest of
the arches to do that as well. Using my QA powerzzz I will be quite strict
=66rom now on with arches making such stabilizations.
> > It is annoying to mark a package stable when it has *clear* QA problems.
>=20
> please dont blow this out of proportion. two points:
> - stabilizing newer versions of a package when there is no QA
> regression is fine.
Fair enough, still those QA need fixing. The fact that these QA probs are n=
ot
regressions doesn't mean it is ok to ignore them
> - ignoring LDFLAGS, while incorrect, is rarely going to lead to
> broken packages being emerged on end users' systems. ignoring
> CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS however is much more likely to result in problems for
> end users when working with multilib or cross builds.
> -mike
Of course. Respecting any *FLAGS is vital and definitely ony of the many
reasons we use Gentoo.
--=20
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Key ID: 441AC410
Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410
--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkxiaUoACgkQ9/cejkQaxBCP3gCaA9wAiYoYbLDTdrGZw3aDydge
LfAAn2u74qrYxlxwFLC3hR6Oad650Mg6
=zXjL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL--