public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, qa@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:11:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100811091138.GA19768@Mystical> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=RoCPQ=8LXLN-hAKQ5owNbMVReY=Pn5ydoyyL2@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2007 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:31:52PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track
> >> down
> >> packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=gnu is a
> >> good way
> >> to do that. I would like to see this linker flag enabled by default on
> >> LDFLAGS
> >> (or at least for the dev/ profiles for now). Do you agree?
> >
> > I would really really *really* appreciated if our beloved arch testers ( at least for linux amd64/x86
> > because they are the first who stabilize a package ) make this default
> > on their build boxes.
> 
> sounds like someone needs to update/extend the arch testing
> documentation.  random e-mails posted to random dev lists are quickly
> forgotten.  new arch testers however should be reading the arch tester
> documnt.
>
I will update the guide for amd64 HT and I will strongly advice the rest of
the arches to do that as well. Using my QA powerzzz I will be quite strict
from now on with arches making such stabilizations.
> > It is annoying to mark a package stable when it has *clear* QA problems.
> 
> please dont blow this out of proportion.  two points:
>  - stabilizing newer versions of a package when there is no QA
> regression is fine.
Fair enough, still those QA need fixing. The fact that these QA probs are not
regressions doesn't mean it is ok to ignore them
>  - ignoring LDFLAGS, while incorrect, is rarely going to lead to
> broken packages being emerged on end users' systems.  ignoring
> CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS however is much more likely to result in problems for
> end users when working with multilib or cross builds.
> -mike
Of course. Respecting any *FLAGS is vital and definitely ony of the many
reasons we use Gentoo.

-- 
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
Key ID: 441AC410
Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-11  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-07 16:32 [gentoo-dev] Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS Markos Chandras
2010-08-07 16:35 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2010-08-07 16:37 ` Alexis Ballier
2010-08-07 16:48   ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-07 18:59     ` Alexis Ballier
2010-08-07 22:08   ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-07 17:18 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò
2010-08-10 21:53   ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-10 22:31     ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-11  9:11       ` Markos Chandras [this message]
2010-08-11 10:42         ` Thilo Bangert
2010-08-12  8:35       ` Christian Faulhammer
2010-08-13 15:11         ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-14  3:43           ` Ryan Hill
2010-08-14  3:50             ` Ryan Hill
2010-08-14  9:23               ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-14  4:14             ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-14  6:41               ` Ryan Hill
2010-08-14  6:40                 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-14 12:08                   ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-14 17:58                     ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-14 18:05                       ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-14 18:31                       ` Samuli Suominen
2010-08-14 18:34                         ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-14 19:46                       ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-15  7:31                         ` Christian Faulhammer
2010-08-07 21:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-08  0:11   ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-08  0:15     ` Alec Warner
2010-08-08  0:21       ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-08  7:57         ` Petteri Räty
2010-08-08  8:37           ` Ryan Hill
2010-08-08  0:22       ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2010-08-08  0:19     ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2010-08-08 11:12       ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-08  2:16     ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-08 11:14       ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-09 23:03       ` Markos Chandras
2010-08-09 23:05         ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-10  8:45           ` Brian Harring
2010-08-10 18:40             ` Francesco R
2010-08-10 20:09               ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-10 20:16             ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100811091138.GA19768@Mystical \
    --to=hwoarang@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=qa@gentoo.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox