From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OhvQW-0000Yj-8I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 02:15:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 603CDE0A9D; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 02:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F43DE0A6C for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 02:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6328F1B40AE; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 02:15:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: Markos Chandras Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 22:16:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, qa@gentoo.org References: <20100807163230.GA31575@Mystical> <201008071732.43567.vapier@gentoo.org> <20100808001142.GA7077@Mystical> In-Reply-To: <20100808001142.GA7077@Mystical> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1827326.79asfnbLUv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008072216.25549.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: bbca7df3-4771-4e22-af98-4ffff01d08d5 X-Archives-Hash: d82e4969026e737d411a131c2c0fbada --nextPart1827326.79asfnbLUv Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday, August 07, 2010 20:11:42 Markos Chandras wrote: > On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:32:42PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday, August 07, 2010 12:32:31 Markos Chandras wrote: > > > It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track do= wn > > > packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=3Dgnu is= a > > > good way to do that. I would like to see this linker flag enabled by > > > default on LDFLAGS (or at least for the dev/ profiles for now). Do you > > > agree? > >=20 > > it isnt a valid flag for everyone. it requires a new enough binutils > > (not too big of a deal), a new enough glibc (also not too big of a > > deal), and you cant be a mips target (glibc support is broken). support > > does exist in uClibc, but only in recent versions (this is an issue), > > and hasnt been widely tested for many targets. >=20 > We could at least enable that on x86/amd64 dev profiles (since only devs > are supposed to use them and they are the most used arches among us) just > to get some more feedback and fix the packages before they reach the end > users. This will reduce the bug # and make sure that --as-needed is > respected in a broader range of packages obviously you only mean linux x86/amd64 dev profiles. i dont have a strong= =20 opinion on that small subset in either direction. =2Dmike --nextPart1827326.79asfnbLUv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMXhN5AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBXIQP/RvTk4J7aqOPNy5ivlcdvVja Q/wVeRJhYPJ6b9NQkPwkUUuXH38RhJDKTYY9GByYaAMHtkl2D0JCsRqB6fy1bX3C hpq2QOFyva0UnNpgQbzS4BfT1MrQ/+3uZoewNT+6E6bXbAdLWhlvq5E6Jhq3ZByq 2C7E59buYTs/12hHVU3KWp8Yqg3NiGj0UOOa0ogrjEeqkg+26pG4HxM4RhbLIRt+ kcBfuQvkmpx8y7fuB587YcnU4vzA0znPd53GTEkRu+S+mSybpZb/DbKQuxRrJQzE eZj5xwnzRoADnjqbLgxoTLS1QcOaiszAi0p8PHyxXe3adi7fJOaZILCBOy80R61o 7fNa20+VygeHrlR9V1wcOEYOxEIBJ+A8r0nsUYtkjmgR3btT/gt2xGPvyNzDAWHn QdsH0ybna8pq+73iOwzy2a1zUqHNEpLWo1M6DDhoyHF0ALA/acCLK9gd+j5BenAc kKxhUgOGnp+it7dwrXWwiOvc1ReoZYAbuTYNbUozLiLFFJXcK8EZ8vyf7PBpISUz OS6QDqJtjXmIG6KgjmFEMcarXeki1Z03Y612aTIWwQV9HBhV7LeNzhHkA795eQwD 2BsFAmYC+9PyGBMsDI0V+/dnaFMutEKGk5WIkuLIoPfxqQBmNwGHFFVYVlg+/xsM 3Cx7h9klgysLMuQqfXc1 =rPQc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1827326.79asfnbLUv--