From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OhrYd-0000AF-3J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 22:07:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92192E0AC9; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 22:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E62BE0ABA for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 22:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48631B416F for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 22:07:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:08:54 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100807163230.GA31575@Mystical> <201008071937.50642.aballier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201008071937.50642.aballier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1473756.QskLdZqR8R"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008071808.55375.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e53a77cf-0ba0-4512-9535-13e9088e635b X-Archives-Hash: 27e27a871eb94fb9d4facd6598131bca --nextPart1473756.QskLdZqR8R Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday, August 07, 2010 12:37:50 Alexis Ballier wrote: > > It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track down > > packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=3Dgnu is a > > good way to do that. I would like to see this linker flag enabled by > > default on LDFLAGS (or at least for the dev/ profiles for now). Do you > > agree? >=20 > no >=20 > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_27dfa5198d43c5ef1b4bfdc7d19e970= f. > xml hmm, i thought i remembered answering this question before. figured i was= =20 just making things up in my head ;). =2Dmike --nextPart1473756.QskLdZqR8R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMXdl3AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBgNcP/1c6Qz+bn/pSIJObS4Rn81wE eLO+A8cRP0PBIRTNc38airfSo/6R5qnzrH22rVUmxegGsBbS+uhBp+MJzD6HynL3 g6Y/i/0I4+6Q26fjsVMopFo61LDE7zpcIDKh2uNocZQgLYdvzOw9UpTFXvnF31nU sXnfbnszszk71IfgK3OrrWSM9P99nv1tixkYKebg5+XTcokPEvJfTYG3QABdBBwW mel9Llhsd1Of7ZGz6aR4oKCdUYFSaJUReT3orJYOpOO9Mu1I+F5XD8SNyF6k4iiq fCXT8AEb8sXsEGwABFtvW2mhSqSuK/7fpEyeel6YTwqLaumPWMP2ZTYLaSsybVtN v2aa3ueO3088cTSmmDq0zoB9fRuXC761S9C9aUEcyZrAwyl0K1gA6lZn0tiU5jSh Yg+uzdcG8oeiUsJBU7uZI5uEJMZRpiX5ojM7l7lC31yKhoHLtrbA+nT6VhXZmIyP 7B22qqS4M5O2X4cMf5NXli2vOADRgzQoFZRO7wQCu91t2cDWPfK6xRaTS4KxQTe5 PMlep2UZbeKL5hHMf2bwFxC3V2m3lQasXWasTzCQWnsbsB0N/4keSc9OLWwKxfOi EM80emcr5jsw75JathHLnmcYtaeOoxt31K2L2bJOQQlLPfkmnfmpkQoZaINvzxUf lp76l0G/EoAuLQpVNbyE =MC9F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1473756.QskLdZqR8R--