From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OhmZH-0001xY-CW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:48:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AC3FE09AB; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 16:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D89E0998 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 16:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so3874910ewy.40 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:48:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MdJtgCwDAhScwxqfqZSOvXsDcDW5ft3PyJ7daBTDivs=; b=EAlKGTvM5j2LuTm9bUiUO1dwTpVIXzMInMfftgaCLuaUodpfO5DPKAAFjhpCQhyqIR xzbF4rMX7AEue0aUG+rI68XHOS3PJ4+Nsn1stWxhYoNQ9BbCiLiX61/BCr8Z8KTAV1Mg aM9T5+jVaeii74ncprC/B94XZFYisjZ2ET6Kc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Ax6lwXfOnbenfmVxNCIR4fsBgGpegVmWoMDf2juPHuYqrNH4bi/mCvVFu/mK+XHPdV AVW1x1M0d7O6tdElz7wqaP8sQ44edPDLpZbMuPDc3qJwh0eVRuzodWX7MMHWGhLqfuvh xKbKki8nqSQmrWlWaw/GBBgwT3jLlEVCBvpno= Received: by 10.213.5.5 with SMTP id 5mr10030792ebt.72.1281199687376; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mystical (178.128.28.78.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [178.128.28.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a48sm4486164eei.13.2010.08.07.09.48.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Markos Chandras Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:48:35 +0300 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS Message-ID: <20100807164835.GA5932@Mystical> References: <20100807163230.GA31575@Mystical> <201008071937.50642.aballier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008071937.50642.aballier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: faa1b2fb-7dc7-40e2-99c2-3103b6a21454 X-Archives-Hash: ea714594534b6aea8bb7c9fe93d887b8 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable O Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 07:37:50PM +0300, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track down > > packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=3Dgnu is a= good > > way to do that. I would like to see this linker flag enabled by default= on > > LDFLAGS (or at least for the dev/ profiles for now). Do you agree? >=20 > no >=20 > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_27dfa5198d43c5ef1b4bfdc7d19e970= f.xml >=20 > A. >=20 Fair enough I wasn't aware that a previous discussion took place on -dev in the past Is there another way to deal with this? --=20 Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxdjmMACgkQ9/cejkQaxBAypQCePigokKGDqNvNkdxiKLgCzpbZ 3aQAnRoFa7sfeACO9eDf3ri6EOR2idm6 =ekct -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--