From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OhmJl-0000Qx-Qz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:32:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 441C6E08CA; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 16:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A470BE0832 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2010 16:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so3871671ewy.40 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=UbubH6/0p8LkaCsyriEQdozd61JP+EZC3RgKgVOwDfc=; b=fbCNRUWbdtT5zkxZB5HlLAYImVzNeTuGpfXagWy1qjiYAE7NLmnhg4JL/FIL2Sjhoy T4A/dqg6gj3N0TCbXHDVB0e/HDBpil++Gm1737m5+1eakbVONyRdyOUBsnc8klAHt5EV By9+9Dm68XAbLyzC0k3Qq1EbKFNX6Lllvg7G0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; b=Zp2qW1u+7Hs64hwAj+Pf5QgMwqv/BtoCjE2hT9Uz/8Vp6Ouw1y+JRRX6HqH73/XSgP 1ow/wiFqsNYWWLh8etp9i7NYrBfbEertQ8FjUJ2KvhqIRCb06oK8oLOPay7hjuCtD8W8 8jO8pffiUc+JuCn4gecGLv/CLFUNPRE9zdbJw= Received: by 10.213.20.142 with SMTP id f14mr10114212ebb.30.1281198721039; Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mystical (178.128.28.78.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [178.128.28.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm4468947eeh.8.2010.08.07.09.31.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Markos Chandras Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:32:31 +0300 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: qa@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS Message-ID: <20100807163230.GA31575@Mystical> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: eae444d8-3711-40d3-b49a-286907e4991a X-Archives-Hash: 7e3cd013dd1ff0dfcd885b1f3568f4fe --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there, It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track down packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=3Dgnu is a goo= d way to do that. I would like to see this linker flag enabled by default on LDFL= AGS (or at least for the dev/ profiles for now). Do you agree? I would also like to know the procedures I should follow to make this defau= lt on every profile as well. Do I need a council approval for that? Enabling this by default we really help QA team to track down packages that don't respect LDFLAGS (hence they don't respect either the --as-needed option which was recenlty added to global LDFLAGS ). Objections/thoughts on that? --=20 Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxdip4ACgkQ9/cejkQaxBB3eACbBs+YFnA+h36Pb62+h54PMd9+ tVUAoIEZl/kkqOHbnwRJkqvdE/gZHanH =/gV+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--