From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Oghqo-0004tQ-Ur for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:33:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1769AE0A8E; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A768FE09FC for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2010 17:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so10791wyf.40 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:33:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XEX5iOxU5fR+gBW/FsXcjYk6wqCE9abHYFeADiaGJ6c=; b=KeBVVJsw8CHvYB+kJyVIicZnUAwn+4o6903lVzYKoihKHSRYhfjEGZCDvRgVe8wSfb DG+D5zyNAUT04aeKa9sC8ELk4KYLuOUG39pmLZj8EzRx5uUicysBKzd9XU01yTdMfjo9 WzLiCI4LJLPuBGhG5XAI8lVtxixLwrv7KQDLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=AaRUgD+hZXHpJkmTUmwlPP85VgiMqr/y7CYZNReHZtZ/szycnTZJPldZQw+Pxsf4yh iAdUrpE2kBGwtEE5VZtw+gHFuMQXKCmd3cajXfLN0XD0MvJEAhairWP0tXyXmsMbUmYe XprTGdhUNDqY4z7rSr5MyQJQwbZMn+vsdso/s= Received: by 10.227.37.164 with SMTP id x36mr7970987wbd.138.1280943219793; Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mystical ([193.92.228.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h37sm4481292wej.47.2010.08.04.10.33.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Markos Chandras Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 20:33:33 +0300 From: Markos Chandras To: Alin =?utf-8?Q?N=C4=83stac?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, net-proxy@gentoo.org, qa@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: net-proxy/squid needs your love Message-ID: <20100804173333.GA19427@Mystical> References: <20100804115055.GA15984@Eternity> <4C599F04.2080905@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C599F04.2080905@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: b74ddc45-02b6-4d31-965f-6ef3e2a55bfd X-Archives-Hash: d79fb570fe6508978531c59beff71d60 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:10:28PM +0200, Alin N=C4=83stac wrote: > Hi Markos, >=20 > I'm very busy in real life, but I'll try to solve all squid issues this > week. > Btw, [2] and [3] were solved from net-proxy's perspective and [1] > wasn't fixed by upstream AFAIK. >=20 > Cheers, > Alin > Hi Thanks for stepping up. If you need more manpower just yell and ask for hel= p from our users. Furthermore, Kerin Millar did an excellent job on bug #311927 so you could work with him ( and co-maintain squid if you want ). That would be the best way imho to keep squid in a good shape :) Seems like my post created some noise and squid will move forward soon \o/ > On 04/08/2010 13:50, Markos Chandras wrote: > > Hi there > >=20 > > net-proxy/squid needs your love. Bug #311927 and Bug #304751 require a > > version bump. Our user community did an excellent job there providing an > > improved ebuild for that. Furthermore there are several open security > > bugs wrt squid [1][2][3][4]. net-proxy herd what is your status? > > Security bugs should be your first priority. If you are unable to > > maintain certain packages you could ask for help instead of staying > > quiet. Maybe we should list this > > package as maintainer-needed and request some proxy-maintainers from our > > user community. What do you think about that? > >=20 > > @Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every > > single project in order to have a clear picture of which projects are > > active and which are dead > >=20 > > @QA: Should step up and commit these ebuilds just to get > > rid of the security bugs which, frankly, don't look that good ( distro > > wise ). I know technically is not our job, but we need to step up here > > and either fix the security bugs since net-proxy can't do that, or mask > > this package which is a no-go. > >=20 > > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/261208 > > [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279379 > > [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279380 > > [4] http://bugs.gentoo.org/301828 > >=20 >=20 --=20 Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxZpG0ACgkQ9/cejkQaxBDMmwCfe7i4qseNCt/iO5YOs+LZ981/ ZsIAn3AyZF4WtGmPiB6und/y3oy3cZyp =xL65 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD--