From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Og3Cz-0006Ue-8y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:10:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6040AE0A4A; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D84E09D6 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DA51B409C; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:10:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Reviving GLEP33 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:10:11 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Matti Bickel References: <4C569638.9000407@gentoo.org> <201008021551.25910.vapier@gentoo.org> <4C573CD5.5090607@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4C573CD5.5090607@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3935393.AMJ9bAUMG8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008021810.12338.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c7db9f6a-6685-4058-92a8-d8e4ae1e18d9 X-Archives-Hash: 6029de4cfc89df8c8d4031737f14cf0f --nextPart3935393.AMJ9bAUMG8 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, August 02, 2010 17:47:01 Matti Bickel wrote: > On 08/02/2010 09:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday, August 02, 2010 05:56:08 Matti Bickel wrote: > >> I've been told that my use of eblits in dev-lang/php is something I > >> should get rid of as soon as possible. > >=20 > > current eblits support isnt going anywhere. so dont waste time trying = to > > change code if there is no real alternative. see Bug 327999. >=20 > Yes, from my reading GLEP33 wouldn't solve bug #327999. But that's a > different issue, isn't it? I don't see how elibs are not an alternative > for eblits. What can you do with eblits you can't do with elibs? i didnt mean to indicate that you shouldnt look at moving forward. progres= s=20 is a good thing after all. =2Dmike --nextPart3935393.AMJ9bAUMG8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMV0JEAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBRrYP/27JQ1SWaFlUyhZkgTTfUeym 0OgYuIyyyu1bfMRwADsKS2nZ1c7g+/n8bfpYWgSuHXAd19/97FKrNhFZrqB+7Jd1 FcjjtPb/0SMWXga7OtY9SuMs6zNxIXKtUVDXVRdpHvEr+y/tlWIYVQ8tWEDu685n n2TgvQrWezz/slOGQ7I2LMGHbAVVwGB9ACcs0qscUN22LLcbKq9VLZLwdSMaCC07 bPYQs7w0F8+3W9/Zc1RNkq43JaHnK9c0EcDEZp+BV0q71hcvFm9J/iBvUn6LXeN3 jtaE3zREC3trWOLbXKnRS8Pj9Pw60/wlZbSYAzTX3EUVAz9Sumt3DL11OHtkAgX/ fG/Dwh1EcNl8HD9iHFHC1NH/9qjtTygX2cIgd1k0m3UX/ivNkU5cgdyUmMJ0pQg2 tR9FN7lCkxXiKXuqEKCeTFLzCcLBMqgA2MXY7WuiJNFeV0G9Yx13uDInJJ9izVDQ cloSAeHSMWUHpSLsPe44a8YdbiU+41Qh6JC5ZyLPO5bg/C28sz89n6YQLYz0/WvN cVHmvMFgtuvc8Y1DxMEoRqBZYF814gBfWG6d7bmJKUyZ+RN9jjqbgm2HO1TQ/P7h FgmelyW9iASS4ihb3+iWW6G46ddtyoXuD+WUbiod+HTC2pe+6Gvg75aUYOLf5kRj cCiQmbzvnQ9I8zgm17T5 =lXr+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3935393.AMJ9bAUMG8--