From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-42000-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1OdY1U-0001fI-1d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:27:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FE69E0B5D; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32091E09AE for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from angelstorm (cpe-76-93-166-255.san.res.rr.com [76.93.166.255]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C47171B4052 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:27:16 -0700 From: Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item announcing as-needed (glep 42 stuff) Message-ID: <20100726172716.6daf94c9@angelstorm> In-Reply-To: <4C4DF3B4.1030408@gentoo.org> References: <4C4DF012.80209@gentoo.org> <4C4DF3B4.1030408@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/v7N9h19LOFU8bAKNvJwH8z7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a25677b4-ff3d-4396-ba0c-acfc8f6c5d38 X-Archives-Hash: a349e2eb84a73dbc3536882b9aa492a6 --Sig_/v7N9h19LOFU8bAKNvJwH8z7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:44:36 -0700 "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote: > This might be a bit unclear to less savvy users. How about just make > sure your LDFLAGS in /etc/make.conf contains "-Wl,--as-needed" or is unse= t? > Instead of saying "overriding", I'd say something more similar to > "disabling --as-needed" and add that it is not recommended. It should be unset; as you say, users should not be screwing with system-wi= de LDFLAGs, as we don't support anything but the defaults. I put an LDFLAGs FAQ in the optimization guide a long time ago: section> <title>What about LDFLAGS?</title> <body> <p> The Gentoo developers have already set basic, safe LDFLAGS in the base prof= iles, so you don't need to change them. </p> </body> </section --Sig_/v7N9h19LOFU8bAKNvJwH8z7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkxOJ+YACgkQxPWMzpKk6kMw5ACgovFHgym5lVxbqO2c9nfASxiZ ua4AmgLgcPd5ekwBBqLnBptlPx45HZOL =V58L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/v7N9h19LOFU8bAKNvJwH8z7--