From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ObbtZ-00073n-Ke for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:11:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFFF3E0AE2; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C60E0B9A for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6LGBSdW028198 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:11:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:11:28 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Two herds (and four extra?) Message-ID: <20100721181128.561c8018@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <4C4707E0.2050601@gentoo.org> References: <20100721133422.32e4b8ae@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <1279715786.20687.13.camel@localhost> <20100721145833.1a7d84ad@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <4C4707E0.2050601@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: 04e79824-e838-4414-a4b5-e4bb97c8afa4 X-Archives-Hash: 6c969a5f2107b8636c2561281ddf354a On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:44:48 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: > I would prefer the bugs be assigned to hardened-kernel@gentoo.org and > cc'ed to hardened@gentoo.org. All relevant devs should be on one or > the other list. However, I am currently the principle maintainer of > h-s. You really don't expect the currently 5-10 regular bug wranglers to remember all that, do you? If you want things listed in a specific order, then just remember the rules: = Alternative A = * first maintainer from the top down gets to be assignee, * otherwise the first herd gets to be assignee. Put them in the right order an you should have no problem with bug assignments. We could discuss this processing order (maybe change it to having = Alternative B = * the top herd or maintainer as assignee (but I really don't want to get tangled up in a discussion about your preferences or anyone's preferences, and how bug wranglers should reflect those). jer