From: Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: wired@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:33:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100717233326.GA28010@hrair> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100717220501.GA18099@linuxized.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1179 bytes --]
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:05:02AM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote:
> The Council will have its next meeting on the 26th of July, 2010.
>
> The meeting will begin at 1900 UTC.
>
> You may use [0] to find out the correct time in your timezone.
>
> Here's a draft list of the meeting topics so far:
> * vote on adding --as-needed to the default profile's LDFLAGS
> * discuss (and maybe vote on) required-use
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/required-use.html
Adding eclass removal policy to the agenda; it directly affects devs,
and the previous policy (imo) is misinterpretted slightly.
Specifically, 06/01/08, portage 2.1.4.4 went stable; this had env
saving/restoration support. The original council decree was that
eclasses had to sit for 2 years- I very strongly posit that the time
period there should've been bound to portage env capabilities rather
than eclass timelines.
Reasoning is simple enough- w/ a proper PM, eclasses can be
removed/modified at will without affecting binpkgs/installed pkgs.
So the question I'd like on the agenda is basically if there is any
reason to preserve the decree- if not, punt it.
~harring
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-17 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100717220501.GA18099@linuxized.com>
2010-07-17 23:33 ` Brian Harring [this message]
2010-07-18 3:13 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2010-07-18 3:21 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-07-18 3:43 ` Brian Harring
2010-07-18 6:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2010-07-18 14:03 ` Theo Chatzimichos
2010-07-18 14:21 ` Christian Faulhammer
2010-07-18 15:33 ` Petteri Räty
2010-07-18 17:43 ` Dale
2010-07-18 23:27 ` Duncan
2010-07-19 0:53 ` Piotr Jaroszyński
2010-07-19 1:11 ` Dale
2010-07-19 1:12 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100717233326.GA28010@hrair \
--to=ferringb@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=wired@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox