From: Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:16:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100715111605.39b2984b@test> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100714191654.GA9101@linux1>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1980 bytes --]
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:16:54 -0500
William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500
> > William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are
> > > in the category media-radio.
> > >
> > > Amateur Radio is not considered part of the media, so I would
> > > like to propose renaming this category to app-hamradio, or
> > > possibly moving the amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if
> > > there are things in media-radio which are not amateur radio
> > > related.
> > >
> > I like the idea very much. But I am an radio amateur and therefore
> > I am a little bit biased :). I was always confused to find them in
> > media-radio. If we do the move please count on me.
>
> I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the
> ham radio apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part of
> the media.
> > But to be honest there are some amateur (ham) radio related
> > packages in other categories too (e.g. app-misc/aldo - a cw morse
> > trainer, app-text/7plus - a packet radio text encoder, ..). So
> > maybe a general cleanup would be good.
> >
> > A quick count in media-radio gives 12 packages for amateur radio
> > and 2 others (the second one coming in just today). In sunrise
> > there are 11 amateur radio related packages and 0 others. That
> > means a move to app-hamradio would leave media-radio nearly empty.
>
> I would say that if the sunrise packages eventually get moved into
> portage, they should go in app-hamradio instead of media-radio, then
> maybe we could move the other ham radio packages over there, but then
> what would be the best choice for whatever is left in media-radio?
>
I wonder if there is a formal approach to add new categories to
the tree or rename existing ones?
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-15 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-14 17:27 [gentoo-dev] rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio William Hubbs
2010-07-14 18:48 ` Thomas Beierlein
2010-07-14 19:16 ` William Hubbs
2010-07-14 20:33 ` Richard Freeman
2010-07-14 23:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul Arthur
2010-07-15 0:43 ` Steve Dibb
2010-07-22 10:53 ` Chip Parker
2010-07-15 9:13 ` Thomas Beierlein
2010-07-15 9:16 ` Thomas Beierlein [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100715111605.39b2984b@test \
--to=tomjbe@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox