From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OZ83i-0006M9-Vv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:55:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95CF8E0CA2; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C38E0C94 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so109907gxk.40 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:16:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RVgi05cqE5DpjchSzU9z/BfKjbQIbQ3P94Av74V4ui8=; b=Macq1CQ3V6eSpCWlz3CoS7XnnDwZ75OutbnJ8lpIB0FBQEuwTIUgRjjk/QJE/BTmmx 6frUzoa3PDUzN5yMIEdym2EAKHoue2nValr8wUoLgeuMYWTukoVg2erT+LwallYwe6/f Q97KqOeUX9OeOuhSCNLLN4IBEJ5NQtklkQpJI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=gfMb0vaFMCF48W+dRc+bTf6GsHZtQH0y54KKeDMBRF61NyzA8WbJ29avVxt4vadfz/ b1XZ+PMSTHmPyx+ewJ8Q8i8qFeo2iIYmwbuOTy5FxT+Vb2i6uthR0GTDTnVkqAbFPME0 utIh6HhUMj1ngDTFXscEBj/9fxz8Iie8DbJL8= Received: by 10.150.187.18 with SMTP id k18mr8198345ybf.404.1279135017552; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-183-49-63.tx.res.rr.com [76.183.49.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v32sm6115278yba.18.2010.07.14.12.16.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:16:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:16:54 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio Message-ID: <20100714191654.GA9101@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20100714172747.GA8883@linux1> <20100714204825.5be468c0@ham> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100714204825.5be468c0@ham> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: f8a8ad66-13f7-4b0e-83fb-993c7b7bd55e X-Archives-Hash: 7eb45cf8c780c44f62901dd5f3749ed6 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: >=20 > > All, > >=20 > > I have recently noticed that our amateur radio applications are in the > > category media-radio. > >=20 > > Amateur Radio is not considered part of the media, so I would like to > > propose renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the > > amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are things in > > media-radio which are not amateur radio related. > >=20 > I like the idea very much. But I am an radio amateur and therefore I am > a little bit biased :). I was always confused to find them in > media-radio. If we do the move please count on me. I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the ham rad= io apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part of the media. =20 > But to be honest there are some amateur (ham) radio related packages in= =20 > other categories too (e.g. app-misc/aldo - a cw morse trainer, > app-text/7plus - a packet radio text encoder, ..). So maybe a general > cleanup would be good. >=20 > A quick count in media-radio gives 12 packages for amateur radio and 2 > others (the second one coming in just today). In sunrise there are 11 > amateur radio related packages and 0 others. That means a move to > app-hamradio would leave media-radio nearly empty. I would say that if the sunrise packages eventually get moved into portage, they should go in app-hamradio instead of media-radio, then maybe we could move the other ham radio packages over there, but then what would be the best choice for whatever is left in media-radio? William --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkw+DSYACgkQblQW9DDEZTjC/gCeLg9jf63p6Ucg6leVp256qzj3 s9cAn03qJY6Suan1QmwwRJnwpaQp3s4e =j5fh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--