From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OVWMY-0003qN-Ph for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:04:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EADEE0B9A; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 21:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04E9E0B61 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 21:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457F51B4002; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 21:04:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 17:02:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Lars Wendler References: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1713191.851oks663B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201007041702.43848.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cabf0dec-172a-4bf1-a130-851a3368fbe7 X-Archives-Hash: 26f4cd39d55f39efdcec9d344a761f3f --nextPart1713191.851oks663B Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday, July 04, 2010 10:29:57 Lars Wendler wrote: > now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be > honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally > becoming stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that > openrc has no upstream anymore. > If there's anyone out there who would volunteer to maintain openrc, please > step up now or else I fear we must abandon openrc which would be very sad. like i already told William a few months ago, it really doesnt matter. ope= nrc=20 was a Gentoo project to start with and since it is all based in git, there'= s=20 nothing for us to do -- we already have an openrc git repo on the Gentoo gi= t=20 server. http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=3Dproj/openrc.git;a=3Dsummary =2Dmike --nextPart1713191.851oks663B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMMPbzAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBqcwP/0eUTJKTxCx/z85SFTAJtA9+ OVdOAVsMRFRjc2d7aAIaXHPgfznuGrcrNG9ox+5sQkqIjBnS1IpTSyx+gHVEf/Gz 4jx2uWPlk+uVR4cNM6FyNMnG0brVKDrlAuV1H9Tv3drHb/g0LJvoC0/bZ3cCLt6T lVru9pWgQ0TJuA9tQqHdO45PA1SNGMA5QQm5AGroYJPbft2VYU3ulBwkkSyLyjie CpUtPAJ/9FCZC5+lIHYB1dU9i4LsVBP8se1FdsY8nyfD+mKuFScmPBFUElN9OToL 78zV5HOEXS9mhlRR4PefHeqp+PhrFyvKl+dzgP6Nv+KeoivnNfq72FW4yvpvonou xVnY2bj9pxkEw0L6TsmdwJu1OsTJr7TDMJn5JC6+r4mVlE2EqZaJBH7xbvr2/R8t Poq/Vh5FIpooQJf1cDdBH53XfxPbbtNFQfcwNMTOFEswaw6yLwAmAAHh9Et1rwvh vogm4MWVCUtHYPZR453BvcZMYseJgNh//lerhHM5nYgVG0WIjfukZaoBgbBbbqbP fOy17d8M+VhoeWyta+zHk5rKX7aJLs48NVo0EtyUSZywY8tPy8EkNqt0VSdYH80H P8Pyno0ELWR86JFFqZvgAKjbbdhixn5O0Yk6eUOpJ/QKukdZq/jnsh9n63fuT27y EW6zYoinRWaLfclJzY60 =FLZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1713191.851oks663B--