From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OU6Ke-0005dQ-2A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:04:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BEEBE0CF3; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9ADE0DA3 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:04:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8151B41DA; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:04:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] debug USE flag misuse Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:03:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jeremy Olexa , "Diego E. 'Flameeyes' =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" References: <1277910540.11106.99.camel@yamato> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6355005.SvNcerikkE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006301903.22515.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 38e675f7-ccb3-486e-9883-809549ce888d X-Archives-Hash: 44fc614309216b2eeccbccfa53e14042 --nextPart6355005.SvNcerikkE Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, June 30, 2010 19:25:32 Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:09:00 +0200, "Diego E. 'Flameeyes'" Petten=C3=B2 w= rote: > > Please check the linked documentation or my blog post[1] on the matter > > if you want to understand the reasoning. I'll be dropping the flag and > > its context from now on if I stumble across it, without further > > warnings. >=20 > What is the consensus on if the metadata.xml specifies that it will add > CFLAGS? Surely it is not as black/white as the global suggests..? >=20 > local:debug:app-portage/eix: Build with CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS for debugging > support; not recommended for normal use. eix is broken and needs fixing =2Dmike --nextPart6355005.SvNcerikkE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMK806AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBlQoQAMw3DZdDvn+x1c3zDdw4BDFZ F0C/KcRa7ZczDZhd4vWjoTOu95kyHxHvklT9tgEn2Ma71fSrOqJL0kmtg3UlpyNE BApjnmcwj+vbfwi3DdaVy6Y4Koc67CGZKyBAunRwGvctMeOWLGAGjRh8dn+i4W+T F1AAppf3kJYkBrGQ5NW9SV/wzCc3+DHEIHztij2zEZI7cRUGsdaD3fw6eoO0vVrV gThuwxpU8EhvYvjIkBTH+aRhObFVRYF1R7/svYZkGd8Xqoe+kQkLVWVm1SNXsBZ2 nDTe4gthLYSyY7OTHhRIm9MnKYxz6ZwK81V326KbuTMJ0RdhYrUpk1Un24Jm+zl3 ZMpd2SIFCH+JtI3MVY0qV1X5PtOkxIOdJDrzELktU+IXg3YqkYp8NYnGrHUGwmn1 WVt4X4W7Lodg/jOTyxcNNj8h4XQQrC3/FPyUiFqxe5Gp+2LTQAx+6l836PfXPZJw n8a9m7ZsP1GNEfpzgK0cojQA0kQBERL1R0HdK0yNLcNOz95i2Ourk9Tx/+S5C270 zyO8SCzVdW1xgrJzSGPw2cbLBJBm6U2w8fwHGKDodFRffTY6J5jXl8izn2iUR/lO hhSM38r0fgtcasqqcB/vAWMuKx6xBtWR7rbzbSeJnyLSAlX4eHHvJuwqrXiPUoPi Iu362AAMosMfQjoKBh5p =LEM9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6355005.SvNcerikkE--