From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSy0s-0003XY-0V for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:59:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80077E0EB9; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A4FE0EB5 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so310424bwz.40 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:59:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BsRzV1qn38rN4kX7qZ8E0i4sepPPX+leUcJgivde7XE=; b=YtbQi3hT2hHT+Z4+enN09brJHgjWzD3Sath1NSo+H/Nu9dW8Eu7S+HZccfUFR23fKj sTvOyQ/8aP7RZlO3DZWQZy02VSuTAiH/0lmCg3XckdUuSW4QihDIacxbLfQQnP1gugVj DEbapOv1f87iMdYXVzbiBeGhgPeSerxiF+0V8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=dZvYvdm6ezc8qIuif1dHMqnet2tGBjrfWqVReF1XvxliSQPF8tKOEXtDfe9fMYOI1Q rioIQnpAO4/spnM1O0oVIMsqv2fsy4nAS4RdNd9ulvw8UG2lM+jlFRBfIDlLhZVjp+vU rPvmLDc+eoNYM2YdXsOY76AywbxeNe4cw3JDM= Received: by 10.204.134.133 with SMTP id j5mr2708036bkt.159.1277668756914; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mystical (79.103.24.94.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [79.103.24.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v30sm13060306bkk.2.2010.06.27.12.59.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Markos Chandras Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:00:55 +0300 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations Message-ID: <20100627200054.GC1414@Mystical> References: <20100627150445.GA19456@Eternity> <1277653669.22988.3.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> <20100627155436.GA19598@Eternity> <1277662873.22988.5.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1277662873.22988.5.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 4e23e630-d1f2-4819-9063-0fd3b5294ad9 X-Archives-Hash: 37c30573d371e56e166d6032930a32c8 --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 02:21:13PM -0400, Olivier Cr=EAte wrote: >=20 > That's ok. That way those users will know that no one from the arch team > maintains that packages and they will know it has a lower level of QA. > And the users will be able to make a choice. Instead of pretending that > it is maintained. >=20 > --=20 > Olivier Cr=EAte > tester@gentoo.org > Gentoo Developer +1. This is what I am trying to say --=20 Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwnrfYACgkQ9/cejkQaxBBXcgCfaW2+Ny3BAV8e0C/zXIjCqSkp UFkAn0dfqksEI513p28VMqsyPI/EBO+3 =VC2L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR--