From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSusb-0004XI-Fv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:38:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1D83E0B7E; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AEEE0AB2 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so820385wyg.40 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=TSYYYx+KdDiGxIX0Ez8ZsvJ+Cy2SKhMeEk/7Eb0PRKc=; b=Ul6PoQ800hkFZTpVwec3KGk54FPO5ZvtQnYt3rVrpvvyPhmzi2y0TVjd21IjyYYJA3 kY80CIKOlF9UbmeYmTcEN62giymIpPNRb1XQoATz1DWnf5Qlmzmopg6ZMeRPxhSwNTpX v7PrJaqY4MYiZpory6cSWpwx2zOa/EpjWVBaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=ZjJBtVnDAyTYmfIGQolXJz7+ohi8Q7u+cD/G7ulsHCtDvUsvsy6T+HedlJroXwlMyd P6UZbN8DiBvfwwZQ56S1abd+6xuB8+h8d7vHh4r3lnAWduXRUG/2JrIGCGrvr6vMayo3 wB5Oz4Nh03W5p3XkPZayw7efJD3E/nD7XxZdM= Received: by 10.227.154.147 with SMTP id o19mr2896611wbw.112.1277656720546; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ([92.16.76.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm35994191wbd.7.2010.06.27.09.38.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:38:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:38:34 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations Message-ID: <20100627173834.230f0f76@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20100627150445.GA19456@Eternity> References: <20100627150445.GA19456@Eternity> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/gU0DifCWjstxUtwmFBmeldj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0cef1734-c4c3-4f67-a731-24ef7cdd012e X-Archives-Hash: 9896f873ecb5b6d6b5f1d9a923af34b4 --Sig_/gU0DifCWjstxUtwmFBmeldj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:04:45 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > Whilst I do understand that these arches are understaffed and they > can't keep up with the increased stabilization load like x86/amd64 > do, I still think that slow stabilization leads to an obsolete stable > tree which I doesn't make sense to me after all. Which does Gentoo care about more: slightly increased convenience for most developers, or considerably increased inconvenience for users of minority archs? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/gU0DifCWjstxUtwmFBmeldj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwnfo0ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhExEQCgs0XfmXWevcuViR0rFEJKgKLc qocAoN7hU0Azj/wWKXam0TR1IzbNuU60 =Ynjp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gU0DifCWjstxUtwmFBmeldj--