From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSvRp-0008D0-Rp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:15:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 098BCE0C9D; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CABE0C90 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so254274bwz.40 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:15:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=N8oknOiK26rlO9gtU8VEWNMhqkAs7uP/pLE/9l7jPfg=; b=Fq5YLclLaNZQohglj1ZfGM5If7FssFb7iHKSqY87qgqg3XD5QYnHcOG83YL6fCDdJ7 NmsTgR8A7o6uelf1MgwfXSBEvcd52zTOth9SC9/DM7tLV6l9Gdjw7i4R79iRI5EWmA92 nIit5t91loOlwt6U/JNjkhzyP0MpnrmLjsKfQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=wC+mzAdyo5cv0xQusenAMaKnHcwYD8jPHi1VI44F6sZXDQWnvXnnwJFFSGkYB9Nk8E zV1UcXeUfitLbqVi9+oqWB71Bqi9CRfOOWN8lfWqmWeDu2xoHbZYrIwTx4KOpnacOtvY WuGD3eZYMMvUUI1ibkHM1oOWVBS7NgPDhOqsg= Received: by 10.204.81.222 with SMTP id y30mr2633834bkk.155.1277658906101; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Mystical (79.103.24.94.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [79.103.24.94]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u4sm14489331bkz.13.2010.06.27.10.15.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Markos Chandras Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 20:16:44 +0300 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations Message-ID: <20100627171644.GA1414@Mystical> References: <20100627150445.GA19456@Eternity> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 356c46eb-158e-4f47-ae88-8dbf1bc95fc2 X-Archives-Hash: e9bf1cea22b75f83e370c2a79555afad --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:53:56PM +0200, Auke Booij wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Markos Chandras wr= ote: > > Thoughts? >=20 > If Gentoo doesn't seem to have time to maintain the stable tree, why > have it in the first place? What really is the advantage of having a > stable tree? >=20 What? I am talking about exotic arches and I didn't say to drop to entire stable tree. Just to shrink it in order to keep it up to date more easily --=20 Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwnh3wACgkQ9/cejkQaxBAqDACeOqSl3uWA14bM0hoL5MakUDGS jSkAn2L4C8mn6oo/iKmmnz70G1SFYA3R =LFup -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8--