From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSgIJ-0001Vj-Nm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:04:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 635F5E0ABF; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AD8E0A60 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from passivegrunt.localnet (ppp121-45-222-22.lns20.cbr1.internode.on.net [121.45.222.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22ABD1B4081 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:03:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Daniel Black Organization: Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: CAcert certificate distribution license to third parties (i.e. distributors like gentoo) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:02:54 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.32-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <200912132244.09435.dragonheart@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200912132244.09435.dragonheart@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5732234.06bA0hNXOJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006271102.59463.dragonheart@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: eff02e5d-64b6-434a-99c5-73403269f840 X-Archives-Hash: 435d255fb46edc447d15e4c6178a8b52 --nextPart5732234.06bA0hNXOJ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 13 December 2009 22:44:05 Daniel Black wrote: > Recently this got produced as a draft license for parties distributing > CAcert's root certificate(s) (like us). >=20 > https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/Agreements/3PVDisclaimerAndLicence= =2Eh > tml >=20 > This is still in draft hasn't been discussed in CAcert's policy group yet. >=20 > If you want to follow/contribute to this discussion look for a post to the > policy list soon. > https://lists.cacert.org/wws/info/cacert-policy >=20 > I make no inferences good or bad about this. Mainly because I'm writing > this with a headache. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Daniel Recently Sasha from Fedora has proposed CAcert's root distribution license = as=20 CC-ND. This avoids many complications of the draft proposal above. By joining the list you can vote for it. the proposal: https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-policy/2010-06/msg00151.html Once registered on this site there is a "send to (your email)" link on the = top=20 right to preserve threading. ref: http://spreitzer.name/set-the-cacert-root-certificates-free Daniel --nextPart5732234.06bA0hNXOJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwmo0MACgkQhhpKunZncJdQtgCffDISSY0yE7bgmkP2m+7VKd1o Gj0An1p4pZq6j+tMJK26Q83w3s6J2bUc =ScyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5732234.06bA0hNXOJ--