From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSpYk-0006yx-V0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:57:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84F3FE09DB; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (forum.psychotherapie.org [217.160.22.205]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9D3E09CD for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by s15216962.onlinehome-server.info (8.13.3/8.13.3) with UUCP id o5RAvoWm031898 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:57:50 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id o5RAq43J010256 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:52:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:52:04 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages Message-ID: <20100627105204.GD23460@nibiru.local> References: <20100625201738.GA4789@nibiru.local> <4C252C8E.8020408@gentoo.org> <20100626193915.GD4789@nibiru.local> <20100626205001.365b51cb@snowcone> <20100626195733.GF4789@nibiru.local> <20100627090900.5378b5db@mosly> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100627090900.5378b5db@mosly> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof X-Archives-Salt: 28f69644-ffbd-4fd2-941f-160dddda1314 X-Archives-Hash: d7f75a2b7c5c2ad5a49916adc13052b5 * Sergei Trofimovich schrieb: > I suggest you to try latest available dev-lang/icc (11.1.072). > This thing is really paranoid: > > remark #2259: non-pointer conversion from "int" to "unsigned char" may lose significant bits > unsigned char BlinkerPhase = 0; > ... > BlinkerPhase = (BlinkerPhase + 1) & 3; In this case, the compiler is wrong: it should convert to int and back to char here ;-p > remark #981: operands are evaluated in unspecified order (tons of them) > return strcmp( left.c_str(), right.c_str() ) > 0; I'm not sure if this really qualifies an warning, since - AFAIK - C spec never said, that there is an evaluation order for function parameters. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------