From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OSbkQ-0003Nv-CV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:13:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3734CE0BCA; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8415FE0B26 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so1866883wwb.40 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:12:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=mtTOIyHEI94lh3RFxuKaMp3cGKNxe3fLmnQu3xHrNQs=; b=df8ucFwfR9iyRqnCEPZNy2ekRDBIwDtGjH/3qZ36AbR06zfYjRvvHK7yV+gSDsmrcL Ywr82zBhH93MixrxRNSDIUk49B1PVUBx3AzDO0CrR7OvvuhfFVDJ8gwX14sl5HfYrlpm r7FJwQQCtRAbatQzK7goGDWImDxYCPAaQvWCc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=UL7tVEn0+98RAVvJTcX68gcTGBfvlcPfRafMSq2xdDvK6JYigPQ0DaHVw7fjC6k02G t7u4BlhEQSQ/Xam2s89HtfsxlamcTVkyTnakT1Pl9UeUY38h+W8HvCfxJb1SmK9IkfWw un//I7j/cFpMALhR1Rv1hxe8FcZvQz4b6lF+8= Received: by 10.227.146.13 with SMTP id f13mr2049505wbv.179.1277583179547; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ([92.16.95.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n31sm53823352wba.21.2010.06.26.13.12.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:12:54 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages Message-ID: <20100626211254.002784d4@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20100626195733.GF4789@nibiru.local> References: <20100625201738.GA4789@nibiru.local> <4C252C8E.8020408@gentoo.org> <20100626193915.GD4789@nibiru.local> <20100626205001.365b51cb@snowcone> <20100626195733.GF4789@nibiru.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/QDpL01Zi+P/nwujlqY4uL_F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: fb28d776-1eb4-4d55-9311-e3b895e25ae7 X-Archives-Hash: d96e4ccf89996b199c2d126d4789c93c --Sig_/QDpL01Zi+P/nwujlqY4uL_F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:57:33 +0200 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > Uhm. No. Certain compilers will give you warnings for f(g(a), g(b)) > > if you -Wall. >=20 > Warn on what exactly ? That f's arguments are evaluated in an unspecified order. > Which compilers do that ? For all you know, gcc 4.7. New gcc releases regularly issue lots of new warnings for correct code, particularly with -Wall. Other compilers are even worse. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/QDpL01Zi+P/nwujlqY4uL_F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwmX0kACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEZxwCgoMeHImUUgCXKJ5hzbJIAE1Fo 4tgAnA3rYumU9YcbcdVbMrXBZMppL+hS =l2J/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/QDpL01Zi+P/nwujlqY4uL_F--