From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ORoc0-0004YC-Li for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:45:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 409D3E0A92; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26607E08BF for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:44:44 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShNgXVOTo6Eraw2l6zSw== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from localhost (p4FC84B4B.dip.t-dialin.net [79.200.75.75]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo63) (RZmta 23.4) with ESMTP id 206651m5OEpTaz for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:44:41 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:44:44 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Should "orphan" package without any "stable" version be stabilized? Message-ID: <20100624174444.72c0cab1@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1277386361.25546.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1277386361.25546.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/TO4BCx4UFYIpNbf.B17Y=od"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 441370b3-6d9f-40bb-9504-5d7cab68259a X-Archives-Hash: 49459c1bce5f137bc4d859178e18a631 --Sig_/TO4BCx4UFYIpNbf.B17Y=od Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Pacho Ramos : > app-office/ledger doesn't have any maintainer and has no stable > version, also, seems that no other app requires this to be > stabilized. I would prefer to keep this in testing until a maintainer > really maintains it downstream, but I am not sure if there is already > some policy on this :-/ Generally it should not be stabilised. But based on common sense (simple program, no dependencies), you could do it. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/TO4BCx4UFYIpNbf.B17Y=od Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwjfXYACgkQNQqtfCuFneOAmgCgjXsmQf0TdgknbGg/8NPRRu8v QN0AoI+5oNrieIs+fu6zFg97Kq56vNly =BpH3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/TO4BCx4UFYIpNbf.B17Y=od--