From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OQTSJ-0000O2-Ck for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:57:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5EECE07F0; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19402E07D7 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so370725pwi.40 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:57:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/bUnxan7aM/Zfwv4AHdlfZXcidiFbiHyklVZZT/59Rs=; b=b63qgyBMh1h+OwPSa9rlC+QUd7DNmOonIALURsJuNazOT1Fu0vki41H+p35YkoFXxZ +AC4PNEFvkA7v7acWYX5idfcZhU8JMePdWi1KY0HUsy5lLT1s5Xp7WvwYmPKdbddNqfc 3Dc7fMSz0i42qlf0UOaH4J5iHUDWJjOK6/2yI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ZoNCXRGQh/e6RQE/VwR6ZKykKDWfdS2XOsgzxa+Ltbu26tb2TMt587FoEISqYzxhSx ugGhNJQnHfVaBqcpwvcYWf+WEuQW2ZxOejhtPJsv82Y0xiR9B6bU5yvMqU2UBxyLZZP0 SSB6cKoWj0BZITcd9LkA/x3brAwtYxaHBP0YE= Received: by 10.142.249.4 with SMTP id w4mr2796407wfh.171.1277074628872; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-67-171-128-62.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n32sm6710572wae.10.2010.06.20.15.57.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:55:10 -0700 Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:55:10 -0700 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: introspection Message-ID: <20100620225510.GM12490@hrair> References: <1277064857.7004.1.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RD6GsZsdEJvsf78O" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1277064857.7004.1.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: a7cd33e5-8849-444f-a7f2-bc79dcb65b41 X-Archives-Hash: 709bd7d5afab8809ded1c8fdea1470fd --RD6GsZsdEJvsf78O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:14:16PM -0400, Olivier Crrrte wrote: > On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 20:12 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > I'd like to propose a new global USE-flag: introspection. > ... > > Any objections? I'll wait till Wed (June 23rd) before adding this if > > there aren't any. >=20 > Do we really want it to be a USE flag ? I would force it on always for > everyone. Due to the direction in which GNOME is heading, it will be > required by the core desktop anyway. Use deps exist for situations like this ;) Beyond that, the naming kind of sucks from where I'm sitting- it's a=20 gobject/gnome specific flag in intention, but introspection has many=20 meanings elsewhere that may not map cleanly there. Anyone got a better name for it? ~harring --RD6GsZsdEJvsf78O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwenE4ACgkQsiLx3HvNzgcUjwCffqv7m5zuXCBxGnJTW4roMOhr dGQAoORRH8MVQhf+sQhts2jivTqz180i =EgBf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RD6GsZsdEJvsf78O--