From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ONqAj-00079x-Mn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:36:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A806FE0921; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E27CE08B2 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so2088335fxm.40 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.26.206 with SMTP id f14mr4304396fac.96.1276446968265; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-253-18-181.adsl.inetia.pl [77.253.18.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z12sm10649026fah.9.2010.06.13.09.36.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Spam Box Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:35:20 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving unmaintained packages to Sunrise Message-ID: <20100613183520.7a5fa92b@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20100613104143.4f61dbe7@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/KS0NAPIbX9+iX25wrpAzDKg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 24cd9963-d081-4d3d-a39e-2c1b45011158 X-Archives-Hash: 3f804de59accec0e98fd5ec50189c840 --Sig_/KS0NAPIbX9+iX25wrpAzDKg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:07:12 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > If you start moving maintainer-needed package on Sunrise then Sunrise > will end up as a garbage collector overlay having many many ebuilds > that nobody will actually maintain. If you care about > maintainer-needed package then step up and proxy maintain it. The > delay ( which is not that big if you cooperate with an active > developer/herd ) might be a drawback but still... I don't want > sunrise to become a place where abandoned ebuilds will end up. But who's talking here about moving abandoned ebuilds just to keep them? I'd wanted just to make it simpler to switch the 'maintainership' from Gentoo devs to Sunrise users, when the second are ready to maintain the ebuild well. You may take a look at Sunrise net-im/ekg2 ebuild as an example. It has probably almost nothing in common with the original ebuild. It even uses an alternate build system, allows to fine-tune the build like not many packages do. Do you consider that an 'abandoned ebuild'? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/KS0NAPIbX9+iX25wrpAzDKg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwVCMwACgkQnGSe5QXeB7v/4QCfdaa794kVnLuYqfACVb73QONt O8gAoNieIhMRakf2BzL1e2UFNpuxvrY+ =HJ3S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/KS0NAPIbX9+iX25wrpAzDKg--