From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ONXFU-00087u-5H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:24:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34B35E09D4; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pv0-f181.google.com (mail-pv0-f181.google.com [74.125.83.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFC9E099E for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvh11 with SMTP id 11so1085410pvh.40 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:24:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/7Wqi8v9nzJiIpyfkM1A9Pl2BhlJzGfbqAaygEkqZxE=; b=OLtSF0yhtsUAHkmVWdcipvf/jDSH0qW1FUqAgHZp/6k3GdvylvlUVF8Qu1I/OPrtCR w7PXyNFpzhhn67f28RlsFFqqaLMl5dz9ZLS+AgyiM+B3NECEmTtfHawlPC/OpTXegiH4 JTKJXECzQMnxJQ9wlkxTvaG4dnb32M96q+YCA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=gOz2klTKVOWnGcMytmy1ajevqKF/YeSazT8uMwynxsbfUj2wHPqNXssGj/LmN4gj4B BjufLdgRzYu//qenXHF1/Sa2kUQbJmaLsKMdH+Xr4oOQGiXDevnuiF9fqsv48x8Ka9EX h3QtnKhbAY4HQGnw2ysFaTCjXr7s+8XH8m7Iw= Received: by 10.114.189.6 with SMTP id m6mr2892120waf.57.1276374245615; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-67-171-128-62.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d20sm31347350waa.15.2010.06.12.13.24.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:22:09 -0700 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:22:09 -0700 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: robbat2@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name] Message-ID: <20100612202209.GB7561@hrair> References: <20100611032726.GA13860@orbis-terrarum.net> <201006110843.25420.tampakrap@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: 28b54885-41f4-4a8e-b06b-c31187ef9351 X-Archives-Hash: 1aa88e626696958f235f162ac31c63c2 --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:42:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > perl_ldap is feature-ful but hard to use. The bind options are > confusing (user / recruiters / infra) do I bind as myself? As anon? > Do I specify -b user or > -b antarus? Mutli-valued attributes are confusing for users. We should specifically have a tool for this instead of having people=20 invoking perl_ldap- said tool also gives us easier validation and=20 sanity checking. I'd started one in '06 but had to retire it at=20 the time due to ldaps not being supported by the python ldap bindings=20 I was using- afaik that issue bindings wise is now long since gone. Robin, any remenant of that survive? Else a new one could be wrote I=20 suppose. ~harring --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwT7HEACgkQsiLx3HvNzgey3gCfS6itE+UNivVJIr4KidFLpehJ L6AAn0u8r4bX1YpyUyythfWxV3joGi3W =PuqZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--