From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ON17c-0006qW-GK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:05:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D123E0BAE; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFE3E0B67 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so147348fgb.10 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:05:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=NKNMaIhUcg50yc55P4u0PPv/1kmmjU6O9VO1sGOggnw=; b=amzf3/x2fduQquyK4hJf3q32IpuG2MH2N93/0Ml1VTVbUwdDJTJvwSeQKO5zjBGEA1 F/I310cNDixC5LNhWJT0tvW0JEcgIcsIg4L6sxpIBTopNx3/O5almVLrc+sqcGJZeEBG /xVeheTp1ALEcrAxy+8FckMGyEzpv6j0haXms= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=oeM5k1WmBfmxopcp7YNWJz6AYQNNcAXTbkLWy/XtRJ1qWoqCbF1DNmGziTshOdzXHN UAXb5OuskQlhcG4lJOLoUfrTK8JrXrggWaGMygz/ZjVHP+I9UlA+csR1zwFG8T8jpHES Ps5n2CJLHxNWd+ZpaPiPRst/4TSgOa26gcJmU= Received: by 10.87.69.8 with SMTP id w8mr2983727fgk.58.1276250736571; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from graffiti.localnet ([195.251.127.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm2265314fgg.17.2010.06.11.03.05.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 03:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Theo Chatzimichos From: Theo Chatzimichos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name] Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:09:23 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100611032726.GA13860@orbis-terrarum.net> <1276241085.16507.588.camel@tablet> <201006110948.37289.reavertm@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006110948.37289.reavertm@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4893201.ELZ1UP1rP2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006111309.29751.tampakrap@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 343bccce-35bd-4e2c-90b7-0750cb528748 X-Archives-Hash: e7e96beea4f44c252ab683fe8a2b53b7 --nextPart4893201.ELZ1UP1rP2 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 11 June 2010 10:48:36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > I'm all for moving to LDAP every info that fits and it's possible. Maybe > even things like Gentoo overlays access. That's not possible, as it is not an attribute that the developer himself=20 should touch, but the overlays team only. Furthermore, access to overlays i= s=20 granted to non-developers as well, so either way it isn't easier for us =2D-=20 Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE, Qt, SGML, Overlays, Planet Teams blog.tampakrap.gr --nextPart4893201.ELZ1UP1rP2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkwSC1kACgkQjDdoMVfcAHibrQCgtfLzMdj/GKL4in7GwqaXwgxZ +5sAni5uiAMimw2BtQk4FL/8InEfNnVn =OeMI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4893201.ELZ1UP1rP2--