From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OMkfP-000348-DQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:31:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 058A6E08E1; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f176.google.com (mail-pz0-f176.google.com [209.85.222.176]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D70E08A1 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so64985pzk.1 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iSjsZFitcAY3H7zETyogHLwD1dhIKqtWZcCn8MoTPXI=; b=DgjM1RCbE3x5NDfYAP+n6dXlfUH6QeoBRChfeNlo2uLwapT6pBs/Fh3pyDPN+639/l SjwIrvDTZDq8htnN7m/8Piiupowum3bjk6pWY8oryT+FJkWIxUo4RhW/YvkAO69wvEq/ Uc0VPxJx48X41c/Pain5BBC9yZWpCF5dKaX1s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=w7TOR1dIMe7mGMCc2NISi391AnWdHp82IZvtMOdMPAlxyT6TmSKQAvZHrXlsiQtbRF mfAAfiKfhCDNpb84Zr0quuuJ2ZOMoHLqNzjTJpBdITP32AtBeKSl2JnyZTY0Jn+WNkve 3x+UFRgXQz/ulC3YVwk7p1/58i5nzNxVinuJg= Received: by 10.140.58.10 with SMTP id g10mr306009rva.85.1276187447639; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.gmail.com (c-67-171-128-62.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.171.128.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k17sm171744rvh.5.2010.06.10.09.30.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:28:48 -0700 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:28:48 -0700 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: changing the developer profile: FEATURES="test" -> FEATURES="test-fail-continue" Message-ID: <20100610162848.GB7012@hrair.jf.intel.com> References: <4C0917B1.8080307@gentoo.org> <4C0FCA9C.6030603@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5p8PegU4iirBW1oA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C0FCA9C.6030603@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Archives-Salt: feaff195-52e9-4cf6-b7a4-6296a63bfaaa X-Archives-Hash: 57b90c8cb2913ae1a45ba531d945d2d6 --5p8PegU4iirBW1oA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:08:44PM +0200, "Paweee Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 6/4/10 5:11 PM, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > What do you think about doing the following change in > > /usr/portage/profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults: >=20 > The following change has now landed in CVS: I'd suggest a dev-announce in the future on that one w/ some lead=20 time... dev profile is admittedly 'dev', but changes that can induce=20 an hour build taking a day due to tests being ran is usually good to=20 give a heads up on. Aside from that, change makes sense. ~harring --5p8PegU4iirBW1oA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkwREsAACgkQsiLx3HvNzgdsFwCg5TOoZkQmg22uZyndK2+8fLsX ncsAnjN6Ze9wrdTaDRIDOPA5tWsijBJ1 =LZuP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5p8PegU4iirBW1oA--