From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OM5Sg-0003nu-1P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:31:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5535DE090A; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A60DE07F1 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82C01B4030; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:31:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] app-editors/vim and USE="vim-with-x" -> Rename to USE="X"? Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 16:30:43 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jim Ramsay References: <20100607144432.07930a25@vrm378-02.vrm378.am.mot.com> In-Reply-To: <20100607144432.07930a25@vrm378-02.vrm378.am.mot.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1736021.F0thGmc5aD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006081630.44098.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: a80b745d-704f-4226-83a0-fd0894415ec1 X-Archives-Hash: d6050fd4f3c858e6f51a501484ff5409 --nextPart1736021.F0thGmc5aD Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, June 07, 2010 14:44:32 Jim Ramsay wrote: > There is an ancient bug[1] dealing with the "vim-with-x" USE flag. >=20 > I think it makes sense to rename this flag from 'vim-with-x' to just > 'X', but thought I'd raise the issue here since this USE flag has been > around since before time began. >=20 > Does anyone care? people want it and i havent seen any compelling reason to avoid it anymore,= so=20 let's rock for the really conservative people who fear a completely trashed system,=20 they're probably forgetting about the static busybox that is on everyone's= =20 system. `busybox vi` gives you a "never gonna let you down" safety net. =2Dmike --nextPart1736021.F0thGmc5aD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJMDqh0AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBABQP/3HtzI/Z3kAOwv9n8v1hbq2j vJ/IXgGXyrDUyGZlOCtz26ErUmuzvvTAQ/N2H3azTFnxuAr1QQXOlbXoPRRdBUv4 gDXwQP+E6IFuafjO9BVicjrtIsqmDfPLA2iwFPRGq2+YoC1BzTNafq95eo37OGjT Sk1sNLabN6KvmCRNukhuxT9iA9nhIQ86GEb13Co/GyRW9pYpZSCFh3Fi2gW0oa2L GotuKtfdxC09ZVqfsciuj3d3XqX0Sbt6TCfFwcz6GgUqApsQKhzr2Yxjcc/CXYln oqwzsDZlAotxmfgB8PHzlnFsXfkHRuB9RK6+HemLWG9AsxWWW2NS0QsGuVyz4w37 Es4ajIW9O8Wdh/UlP5iQzM7pwCudrdIAZRbaE1lpAUBnZFcRwAYFLPsO4De0tfmT 0IrqLR94XqRblFXA8B/7o1Us4IKWPqmN/naUl2W8cYaH5+ilGF6cFzh5asm5qxiX w5IpNZkBL3/wAyB02U9lUPUNZvUR2mj3w4kxdGq6cdysmKVOv5op7jT4davbuS2o zYDHTqlIVYO85vcEUi/iWLIMi9l//ZKK1jPWOtRutEdbC6UE7mPAibqPLkCYrGjg ZBB4fj6ly83xLU7w64+XW+/XyxYYChTFZpwtvq8F8mMRFW/la+zZzMlKugdmnHiH kX8nASkglqZ0hiTlrUPN =R/j6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1736021.F0thGmc5aD--