From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OH7KY-0002Va-4O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 03:30:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F079E0C40; Wed, 26 May 2010 03:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB161E0C24 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 03:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4Q3UdOo021430 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 05:30:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 05:30:39 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bug wrangler queue is large... Message-ID: <20100526053039.42813a8f@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20100526050210.4067398c@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <201005180802.09430.mail@akhuettel.de> <201005251424.05620.vapier@gentoo.org> <4BFC1AE9.3080700@gentoo.org> <20100526050210.4067398c@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: ed429115-88b4-48ee-8450-8eae52033a11 X-Archives-Hash: 77a5e9548fd61862c809d9c7bf1f4816 On Wed, 26 May 2010 05:02:10 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/index.xml > > If you find that you can't do that, then we should be sorry for the > maintainers. Bug wrangling is the most unthankful job you can > voluntarily perform, so there. To follow up on that, we could add some language to the point that if it takes more than X days (say a week) then assignment to maintainers proper should go through. This could be especially important when bugs do seem relevant but should be looked at by someone (or a freakin' whole "herd") with somewhat more intimate knowledge of the package in question. Regards, jer