From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OH6vt-0007Jr-OJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 03:05:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32A59E0BD5; Wed, 26 May 2010 03:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D3EE0B9A for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 03:05:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4Q35I3G014308 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 05:05:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 05:05:18 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bug wrangler queue is large... Message-ID: <20100526050518.2a388929@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20100525200807.GA1515@boostbox> References: <201005180802.09430.mail@akhuettel.de> <201005251424.05620.vapier@gentoo.org> <4BFC1AE9.3080700@gentoo.org> <201005251534.18498.vapier@gentoo.org> <20100525200807.GA1515@boostbox> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: 052fde07-f3f0-4ab2-8f40-6699a87171c4 X-Archives-Hash: b84436ce3df8f65d321e94bde58c04c6 On Tue, 25 May 2010 22:08:55 +0200 Harald van D=C4=B3k wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:33:33PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 May 2010 14:46:01 Matti Bickel wrote: > > > I wrangle bugs when there's a need and I'd > > > like to hear what maintainers want to see on a bug assigned to > > > them. If info is missing I usually ask for it and assign the bug > > > anyway. If that's not wanted, let me know. > >=20 > > i dont feel like this should go to the maintainer yet. if a report > > is missing something that the maintainer needs, it isnt ready for > > them to look at. so wranglers ask for it, leave it assigned to > > bug-wranglers, and close as NEEDINFO. when (if) things become > > available, it can then be re-opened and moved to the maintainer. >=20 > No, don't close as NEEDINFO, mark as ASSIGNED. NEEDINFO bugs cannot be > reopened by other users, even if they provide the requested > information. NEEDINFO bugs are also easily forgotten about when the > reporter forgets to reopen the bug him/herself. Plus, it's in the > docs anyway. If you have to CLOSE a bug because it's blatantly lacking the proper info, language, spelling etc, then CC yourself. It's the least you can do to make sure there's some kind of follow-up. Regards, jer