From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OH6q0-0006JJ-9k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 02:59:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92100E0B01; Wed, 26 May 2010 02:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B10E0ADE for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 02:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4Q2wiSK012730 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:58:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 04:58:43 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bug wrangler queue is large... Message-ID: <20100526045843.68a33e1b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <201005251424.05620.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <201005180802.09430.mail@akhuettel.de> <201005251424.05620.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: 9efc8266-bbc1-4272-bb54-8a7756c72c57 X-Archives-Hash: 65c2a648b9c2ae5f3ae1e1fd2534c920 On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:24:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 18 May 2010 02:02:01 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > could you please help the poor bug wranglers a bit?! The queue has > > reached 170 unassigned bugs... > > people dont seem to realize that bug-wranglers isnt just for > re-assigning to the proper maintainer. they are supposed to be doing > basic triage, user feedback, as well as cleaning up the bug. i > shouldnt be seeing bugs assigned to maintainers that have > "${PN}-1.ebuild" as their subject, nor bugs that lack basic things > like `emerge --info` or build logs. -mike Without looking at the rest of this whole thread, that's lucky lucky wishful thinking. It doesn't match reality. Hope you're OK with that. Regards, jer