From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OH8Bc-0002Q2-2A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:25:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3B88E0A6B; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B848E0A02 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD221B4097; Wed, 26 May 2010 04:25:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bug wrangler queue is large... Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 00:25:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jeroen Roovers References: <201005180802.09430.mail@akhuettel.de> <201005251424.05620.vapier@gentoo.org> <20100526045843.68a33e1b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20100526045843.68a33e1b@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8796133.zLIA0iTGqu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005260025.30217.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: fb6ec04c-c884-42df-831e-91090b5e1673 X-Archives-Hash: 9dabf7fff22f170f6dc5638ec697f1a1 --nextPart8796133.zLIA0iTGqu Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 25 May 2010 22:58:43 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2010 14:24:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 May 2010 02:02:01 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > could you please help the poor bug wranglers a bit?! The queue has > > > reached 170 unassigned bugs... > >=20 > > people dont seem to realize that bug-wranglers isnt just for > > re-assigning to the proper maintainer. they are supposed to be doing > > basic triage, user feedback, as well as cleaning up the bug. i > > shouldnt be seeing bugs assigned to maintainers that have > > "${PN}-1.ebuild" as their subject, nor bugs that lack basic things > > like `emerge --info` or build logs. >=20 > Without looking at the rest of this whole thread, that's lucky lucky > wishful thinking. It doesn't match reality. Hope you're OK with that. reality matches what i said. bug wranglers *are supposed to be*. if reali= ty=20 matched what i wanted, then i wouldnt have written an e-mail of "supposed t= o=20 be" and "shouldnt be" statements. =2Dmike --nextPart8796133.zLIA0iTGqu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJL/KK6AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBV7YP/RggjYF8fnZKZx91KPpjwc9n 1Tdv4CuQlmgtdaaCTZgEFVWZzKWMWP+/4c5+CxvyEYBkqL4BYLErOaAeQykr9qxS q2e3ck15oGSrRN2ZEu74YvADyeLPa8ZrZlEIQcNvffjROvDGx8pb4xduTtA1rqZJ Z87iEhIBevZBKZF6wcLBodbHmk4tOz6zJE/Rjgb110Ma+j0avpcrDwaU+hs4ijte HDi9k6D46kFeSMV4sr5OVaqwvXsKr6wQjwYY21YB52RUJXqwHEBNxchl0xYWcWOX Tc7OUCSKrYAEWW9dqjNxchxANpBkcJsmLo9YIWDCi7ds12kdm/fECKiqcjrmn4st wduxb5aHlbFvJVwehjEEeK3hEVIdowfi48pu0/eNqoP+vrHg1k60b1A3veTvgQGV jlSpCNXL6vafpjqlt1BPCt20ae5n/rNdW0MIYGWn1BI8Kzy/cap+6cOi/I197+mf aK2gpOgg/vTHpuJg77mrLLK27xoc9XUgiEvHO0VJrGo6eNDlaHO0GBfRuPFhCZKe zCSCYA4wZ4llk4kq7KrGTcaJY8RDO2OTsUUUopgwD7dmejthIxPHhFSHNHV21G+C PPTT0uc8q3qVghxyzDU9ktvPivcuAK5ZSyCsigUJMVCIbFURFQ7268hoSeVPP01o +YdBdtEZPg8XRHaqniZt =btWy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8796133.zLIA0iTGqu--