From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OH2Df-0005lo-3t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 22:03:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 204AAE0C32; Tue, 25 May 2010 22:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FDEE0BF9 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 22:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DDD1B402A; Tue, 25 May 2010 22:03:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bug wrangler queue is large... Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:03:19 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Matti Bickel References: <201005180802.09430.mail@akhuettel.de> <20100525200807.GA1515@boostbox> <4BFC3BDF.8060608@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BFC3BDF.8060608@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3281264.dyblarU3mG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005251803.20423.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: bdb09f24-04e6-43a0-8af4-7f26731f902a X-Archives-Hash: f87b4a8480f001b0d4a5293905f397d8 --nextPart3281264.dyblarU3mG Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 25 May 2010 17:06:39 Matti Bickel wrote: > On 05/25/2010 10:08 PM, Harald van D=C4=B3k wrote: > > NEEDINFO bugs cannot be reopened by other users, even if they provide > > the requested information. >=20 > I utterly fail at finding documentation on that. I've recently hit a > problem where a user couldn't reopen a RESO FIXED bug, too. Are bugzi > permissions documented somewhere? the bug reporter can open their own bugs. gentoo developers can open any b= ug. =20 that's about it. (there are other rules minor, but they arent really relevant) =2Dmike --nextPart3281264.dyblarU3mG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJL/EkoAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBHoEQAKYXDi3fk8XG6abYFy4asIlw Nsh/hjJcNY4cJecdyq5pYOTDuMzDMZOfi1NglpwHNM8yy640tJq4J7WQABqyyG/w 7O+xLIs9KiH9KUZw287W9zMMMQmwmQe5gBdUr1z5yGtPoID7Mh+zsBbTaDb4/mUU TfEJ3WNdV8+6mYF2ZT81FMk6Y/rv7CBIYmbVzLCxs+e5Q9LauO5h3QfugyInps+G HHOg8fvH4BUfUE+7ygryJhCSTX3S7pqTSX527NMOj3NjF0LREmZniqiep9dijVhh ivyBflxwc6CAHlpkkejhYT/C0hU019ElSMBtsMjSrZsPClM+OyGSfzu15nHQOPzc WIipqcQoVSSiH4YhDDxcYHxgyfAs3LcOH9KmWSGYvteIWZB2oXIzEPAnB2x2Ql9q 71emUJYQastesVF3fEd3kR1dhfdN2ey0tjb/qCOJ3oE9reMCHYhPgn/hM/7qMfbU eLwlKvsXPaljvPWsshAh/SLYrtEWNuxfupvEEe067LCOLWUwKya2Jf1Lsquvp8+D xBlb4X/Q1LG4dCFWGLvU+9ZYLz+z9SgcK03zpvZKwrIgJikMGrviWBwlCnOsrjpI nrS8hTBiudaJCcTW4n8NvmgpQ868qyIr4Zi/JtfHI4Y754tKCWdOx027C5xB5Hxu SaBnqBiOv7rs+36qWfCx =bKef -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3281264.dyblarU3mG--