From: Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use the VERIFIED status in bugzilla?
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:01:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100514090114.3f55e9cb@angelstorm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BED4602.6040700@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 May 2010 12:45:54 +0000
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Following Petteri's thread last month about RESOLVED LATER and given a
> issue that has been reported to User Relations about the "ab"use of the
> VERIFIED status in Bugzilla, I'd like to get some feedback from fellow
> developers.
> We have a user that has been marking resolved bugs as verified following
> his actions on other bugzilla(s) and he quotes the Bugzilla Docs[1] to
> explain his actions. Some developers have become upset because of the
> "spam" email that action causes.
> It seems to me the reason those developers got upset is that they don't
> value the VERIFIED status so I wonder if anyone uses that status or if
> we should just drop it. If possible and useful, would we like to
> restrict the VERIFIED status change to a specific group of people?
> Please share your thoughts on this so we can decide how to act on this case.
Punt VERIFIED. It's useless for documentation and for everything else I do.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkvtc8wACgkQxPWMzpKk6kOD2wCgqr+brRXJljXR+wDk8+fOETUG
sQQAn3gJVt3rclCmXyqHfwu/D4fBgFkG
=7I70
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-14 12:45 [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use the VERIFIED status in bugzilla? Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2010-05-14 13:28 ` Fabian Groffen
2010-05-14 13:34 ` Samuli Suominen
2010-05-14 13:54 ` Matti Bickel
2010-05-14 14:08 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-05-14 14:10 ` Richard Freeman
2010-05-14 16:01 ` Joshua Saddler [this message]
2010-05-15 19:39 ` Rémi Cardona
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100514090114.3f55e9cb@angelstorm \
--to=nightmorph@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox