From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O5BzP-00026F-Jp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:03:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 349E1E087A for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDA2E05EF for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from epia.jer-c2.orkz.net (atwork-106.r-212.178.112.atwork.nl [212.178.112.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3N5Fwh0014559 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:15:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jer@gentoo.org) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:15:52 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists Message-ID: <20100423071552.07db7568@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <201004221857.31525.hwoarang@gentoo.org> References: <4BCE6872.4040309@gentoo.org> <4BCE8646.5020309@doublecreations.com> <4BCEE14D.7060601@gentoo.org> <201004221857.31525.hwoarang@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Archives-Salt: c620a4d6-9ef4-4336-8163-b523595fe2c8 X-Archives-Hash: c4013b4cc59026d59b1ecf345c0e2181 > > IIRC, this list was created to promote a way for developers to > > discuss Developer Relations policies. > > Even though this is likely to be most of the time a low traffic > > list, I think it still has merit - unless we chose to promote such > > discussions on a different "forum". > Yes but we ( as developers ) tend to handle devrel bugs in a > different way. That is open bugs and assign it to devrel. INHO this > mailing list is useless Those bugs are assigned to an alias, not a mailing list. If devrel wants a mailing list to occasionally discuss general devrel issues publicly, then that has nothing to do with devrel bugs, which are closed from the get go. jer