From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O4yuT-0005X9-F1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:05:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D61DE0AA5 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpauth13.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth13.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.37]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EC6EE0853 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27420 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2010 15:57:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (77.49.141.43) by smtpauth13.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.37) with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2010 15:57:37 -0000 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:57:31 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-zen6-night-elf; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4BCE6872.4040309@gentoo.org> <4BCE8646.5020309@doublecreations.com> <4BCEE14D.7060601@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BCEE14D.7060601@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004221857.31525.hwoarang@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9daca12b-5234-4953-8f15-84e327324f9e X-Archives-Hash: b45dbcc693abd7e678b6d4f4d5235ff3 On Wednesday 21 April 2010 14:28:13 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > - gpg control packet > > On 21-04-2010 04:59, Vincent Launchbury wrote: > > On 04/20/10 22:52, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > >> Hello, > >> As suggested in bug 291860, I am heading up an infra cleanup project to > >> disable/close some mailing lists. Since the list is quite large, I want > >> to send it out for RFC. > > > > Going by archives.gentoo.org stats, the following lists are also > > inactive, and are all listed as 'Primary Gentoo Mailing Lists' at > > www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml > > > > If there's a reason to keep any of them, perhaps they should be split > > off to a 'Low-traffic Lists' section, as I can't see them being of much > > use to most people. > > > > gentoo-devrel > > > > 2010 - 0 posts > > 2009 - 1 post > > 2008 - 2 posts > > 2007 - 8 posts > > IIRC, this list was created to promote a way for developers to discuss > Developer Relations policies. > Even though this is likely to be most of the time a low traffic list, I > think it still has merit - unless we chose to promote such discussions > on a different "forum". Yes but we ( as developers ) tend to handle devrel bugs in a different way. That is open bugs and assign it to devrel. INHO this mailing list is useless -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org