From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O0nUP-0003LF-Lq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:05:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 778B1E0908; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from patrick-nagel.net (patrick-nagel.net [78.47.82.81]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565A4E08A4 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by patrick-nagel.net (Postfix, from userid 1015) id 6DE1F9FC041; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wang.localnet (unknown [121.228.39.86]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by patrick-nagel.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A82569FC036 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:05:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Patrick Nagel To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:05:18 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <4BC09BE4.8020901@gmail.com> <20100410171841.GA5063@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20100410171841.GA5063@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4683992.fO0OnAEauu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004111105.23025.mail@patrick-nagel.net> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: cbf71bca-8881-4667-ae02-c30ee6a4a7c4 X-Archives-Hash: 90d506dbe9b4d55e21da5843a8ac33de --nextPart4683992.fO0OnAEauu Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi William, On 2010-04-10 17:18 UTC William Hubbs wrote: > > Is there a better system? >=20 > The ideal captcha would not be visual at all. For example, on another > site I am involved with, which is not quite online yet, we are talking > about implementing tseveral levels of captcha such as: >=20 > - a math captcha (you will be asked to solve a simple math problem) > - a word captcha (fill in the missing letters of a word) > - a phrase captcha (complete the phrase) >=20 > Could something like one or more of these be possible? =46or MediaWiki, a math captcha would be easy to get in place: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ConfirmEdit I don't know how effective that really simple captcha is, but I know a few= =20 not-so-large Wikis that use it, and don't have a spam problem. Also, I'm su= re=20 it would be easy to modify the source to add some more tricks, once the fir= st=20 spam bots got past. Patrick. =2D-=20 Key ID: 0x86E346D4 http://patrick-nagel.net/key.asc =46ingerprint: 7745 E1BE FA8B FBAD 76AB 2BFC C981 E686 86E3 46D4 --nextPart4683992.fO0OnAEauu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvBPHIACgkQyYHmhobjRtRtdwCeM4LcgP4KJqAF52CG8jPNKZAN PWkAoJof0t/WFw9UnbPRknSI9Sth5EhJ =n3WF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4683992.fO0OnAEauu--