From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NzBD8-0002Jg-92 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:01:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DBF3E09CE; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E82CE079A for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so39430bwz.26 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.82.36 with SMTP id z36mr3891208bkk.88.1270569642887; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pomiot.lan ([81.219.105.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm6264528bwz.15.2010.04.06.09.00.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Spam Box Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:00:50 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass Message-ID: <20100406180050.785c1c3d@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20100330111154.GA28735@veller.net> <20100403122902.TAc3125.tv@veller.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/2aOWfcEu7Dk2Qjmu2tOdu8D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 638bbcdd-6c2f-471e-a82c-7554fbe3434b X-Archives-Hash: 337353ddcb3c4d50945cec282ca4eb17 --Sig_/2aOWfcEu7Dk2Qjmu2tOdu8D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:25:27 -0400 James Cloos wrote: > Perl people -- I'm one -- use man(1); given the differences in > usefulness, I cannot imagine why anyone would prefer perldoc(1) > over man(1). I prefer perldoc over man. And I cannot imagine why anyone would prefer keeping two copies of the same docs if generating one from another takes less than a second. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/2aOWfcEu7Dk2Qjmu2tOdu8D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku7WrgACgkQnGSe5QXeB7vhBwCfeGy/ef8bnDG1eE1vHnkNtjyu mygAn3nCCqJSw5CH6GloFAiBid5dMWID =vUjR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2aOWfcEu7Dk2Qjmu2tOdu8D--