From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz5MY-0006iT-TI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:46:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8756CE09BD; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232A1E092D for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so1665140bwz.26 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.9.6 with SMTP id j6mr7663545bkj.37.1270547155680; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pomiot.lan ([81.219.105.95]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm6041696bwz.5.2010.04.06.02.45.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Spam Box Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:46:03 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Message-ID: <20100406114603.5bf5af5e@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <4BBACAE5.8020400@gentoo.org> References: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org> <4BBACAE5.8020400@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/1kRPMXHl=0r4R6vd0e55YHf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d4166b72-20bb-4e87-ba9e-ba83a88bf10f X-Archives-Hash: c9214e8b6161882d82f3fbde26e93140 --Sig_/1kRPMXHl=0r4R6vd0e55YHf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:47:17 +0200 R=C3=A9mi Cardona wrote: > How about changing how users search instead? >=20 > Let's make the small search box search for ALL bugs instead of just > opened ones. *That* should help tremendously. Adding additional bug types to search for by default - ok. Forcing search on all bugs - that's an overuse. In fact, myself I frequently search for a particular bug using the package name only - as users tend to use very many descriptions for the same issues. If that search returned me hundreds of years-old bugs, it wouldn't make much of a sense. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/1kRPMXHl=0r4R6vd0e55YHf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAku7AuAACgkQnGSe5QXeB7szCQCdETV4uIg8e4RBYJnxRUNtLNYv 3D4AoKugsWn3/WCjRN7vlriu2VUdA1q1 =sFLf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1kRPMXHl=0r4R6vd0e55YHf--