From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@eris.oppresses.us>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] recruitment process
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:57:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100405175731.GA25573@eris.oppresses.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BBA14E9.20204@gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 05:50:49PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
> That assumes the system is working perfectly and the whole fact that
> we are having this discussion would go against that.
>
> From what i've read in the community, lots of people would have no
> problems helping out maintaining packages, they just don't want the
> baggage that comes with it.
>
> You could say they're lazy or they're not the "type of developers
> you want" but at the end of the day they're just different
> developers, most of whom probably just want to make sure the
> packages they like are in the tree and updated.
Which is all well and good -- the "you wrote some ebuilds so here's
your commit privs and @gentoo.org" approach to recruitment worked great
when Gentoo had a few dozen developers.
Today QA is a bit more important, and development is often rather more
complex than "new version, bump the ebuild" -- it's important that new
developers have a firm understanding of ebuild complexities.
I have no dog in this fight, I don't even like resurfacing to post to -dev.
Just here to offer some insight on why we originally kept the quiz system.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-05 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-05 1:33 [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] recruitment process Tobias Heinlein
2010-04-05 5:50 ` Eray Aslan
2010-04-05 16:07 ` Jon Portnoy
2010-04-05 16:50 ` George Prowse
2010-04-05 17:57 ` Jon Portnoy [this message]
2010-04-05 18:28 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-05 18:26 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-05 17:35 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-06 2:16 ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2010-04-06 13:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-04-06 16:16 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-05 18:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Nathan Zachary
2010-04-05 18:59 ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-07 17:35 ` Markos Chandras
2010-04-05 7:48 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2010-04-05 8:19 ` Brian Harring
2010-04-05 13:38 ` Richard Freeman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-03 13:40 Ben de Groot
2010-04-03 13:53 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-04-05 2:36 ` Alistair Bush
2010-04-05 8:23 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 13:53 ` George Prowse
2010-04-03 14:05 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 14:22 ` George Prowse
2010-04-03 21:39 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-04-03 14:03 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 19:00 ` Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
2010-04-03 21:48 ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-04-04 9:43 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-04 16:24 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-04 15:16 ` basile
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100405175731.GA25573@eris.oppresses.us \
--to=avenj@eris.oppresses.us \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox